The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
Work +86 10 8836 9999
Fax +86 10 8857 9996

Simon Tsi, Managing partner

As one of the founders of Chang Tsi & Partners, Simon Tsi not only facilitates the firm’s growth from six people to 200 staff in 15 years, but also witnesses the phenomenal changes in legal and social environment of China.

What do you see as the main points that differentiate Chang Tsi & Partners from your competitors?

Firstly, it’s about the comprehensiveness of legal service we provide. Chang Tsi & Partners focuses on practicing all areas of intellectual property law. Striving to be the best IP firm in China, providing quality and efficient legal services to clients are the firm’s values. Chang Tsi & Partners is well-known for its responsiveness, quality of work, extensive knowledge in working with international clients. The firm has benchmarked itself against industry leaders. We believe that client interests come first. Our job is to maximise a client’s legal rights in China. Chang Tsi & Partners provides one-stop, multi-leveled and comprehensive legal services to our clients.

Secondly, by working with our international clientele and partners, Chang Tsi & Partners has learnt from the best. We have formulated and been improving the work processes. As a solution provider, clients’ satisfaction is our ultimate goal. We are grateful to have assisted Fortune 500 companies including 3M, Johnson & Johnson, The Home Depot, Amazon, Illinois Tool Works, etc. Many leading Chinese companies have entrusted us, such as Baidu, Air China, China Railway Science Academy, China Life, China Development bank and many more. It is our principle to answer every work email in one working day and process all request as soon as we can.

Thirdly, Chang Tsi & Partners has a diverse and experienced team. We have over 200 attorneys, consultants and professionals providing services in English and Chinese. The legal team is supported by compartmentalised departments that are responsible for docketing, business insight, marketing, human resources, finance and admin. At the same time, upon client’s need, we also work cross-department and share all available resources. Chang Tsi & Partners are highly capable in handling difficult and complicated cases in all areas of intellectual property and dispute resolution. We are known for thinking strategically and outside of the box.

In all, we strive to provide comprehensive solutions answering client’s needs in the most responsive manner.

Which practices do you see growing in the next 12 months? What are the drivers behind that?

Relatively speaking, in the intellectual property field, I think the need to resolve corporate law related matters will increase. For example, many state-owned enterprises in China and some of large private Chinese companies have realised the value of strategic intellectual property protection. Their IP practice has turned from filing-centric to the management of IP assets in a holistic manner. Thus IP value-adding planning and commercialisation will become more than more important.

On the other hand, with the on-going trend of Internet+, big data and artificial intelligence, some simple and more procedural work might less likely be handled by people. The work division of legal services will be more and more specific, some of the high-end legal fields which require lawyers’ high professional qualities would develop fast, such as overseas compliance, cross-border M&A, cross-border litigation, intellectual property, antitrust, etc. These areas will require professionals with more experiences and capabilities.

What's the main change you've made in the firm that will benefit clients?

I think our clients have found our client manager system valuable. This system abandoned the functional divisions, which is more attorney focused. At Chang Tsi & Partners, two team leaders manages a team of attorneys and paralegal providing every type of IP service. Clients do not need to contact various attorneys for different cases, because they system requires team leaders to have a comprehensive understanding of a client’s portfolio. This system breaks many communications and collaborations barriers. I believe it is more client-centric and more efficient.

Is technology changing the way you interact with your clients, and the services you can provide them?

I would not say our services has changed because of the technology. But I think how we deliver our services have changed. Facsimiles used to be the most efficient and now is almost completed replaced by emails. With Cloud-based technology, both our clients and attorneys can communicate remotely from anywhere. Technology has made our service more accessible and allows us to be more responsive. Another example is the wide-adaptation of using instant messenger applications, such as WeChat. Many of clients have WeChat accounts and directly ask us to form WeChat groups to discuss cases, provide status update and ideas. Overall all of us are more connected because of new technology.

Can you give us a practical example of how you have helped a client to add value to their business?

Chang Tsi & Partners has been providing intellectual property legal service for Air China over a decade. Our firm assisted Air China’s in-house team built a comprehensive intellectual property management system. This system supports prosecution, enforcement, brand value-adding, commercialisation, work processes and principles and strategy formulation. According to brand agency’s evaluation, the brand value of Air China has increased 7 times from RMB 16bn to RMB 115bn. Among leading Chinese brands, Air China ranked 23rd. Our service enabled Air China to extend its service to more countries overseas.

Are clients looking for stability and strategic direction from their law firms - where do you see the firm in three year's time?

I think clients are looking for value. The best value would come from collaboration, understanding, trust and share of duties. I believe a sustainable, healthy relationship requires all parties share the same goals, same values and same principles. We are stable in a sense that we have always stay available to answer client’s enquires and expectations, and we believe in our values and service commitments. For example we offer annual overview of all practices to clients, if necessary. We are flexible because we adapt to client’s needs, budgets and we are not afraid of think further. These would be the Yin and Yang of our services. We have many clients worked with us many years that trust our strategic advice. We also work with clients who might only need a short-term tactical advice.

In three years’ time, I see our attorneys grow along with our clients, so does our firm. In Chinese there’s a saying, “it is easy to win, but it is difficult to always be a winner.” Fortunately we have an amazing group of clients and colleagues that benchmark against excellence. Therefore we see practice excellence as winning. Our client portfolio might encounter some changes because of Brexit, trade agreements among China and other countries, as well as other Macroeconomic changes. I stay confident that we can maintain competitive advantages. Chang Tsi & Partners persists in being the best intellectual property law firm in.

Legal Developments in China

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • What is the relationship between PPP and concessions?

    From fledgling concessions to PPP that is sweeping the country today, there are two major sets of regulations to be followed: one being regulations for concessions led by the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) and the other the series of regulations for PPP led by the Ministry of Finance (“MoF”).  However, to date, there is still not one law that expressly defines the relationship between the two, resulting in much confusion and many impediments in practice.  The relationship between concessions and PPP is an issue currently desperately needing clarification.
  • Thought on Developing Convention on Enforceability of Settlement Agreements Reached Through Concilia

    The UN Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”) held its 47th session in New York on 7-18 July 2014 and the Author had the privilege of attending the conference at invitation of Mr. Yu Jianlong, President of the Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group (“APRAG”). During the conference, the U.S. Government submitted a proposal suggesting Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) of UNCITRAL (“Working Group II”) to develop a multilateral convention with respect of the enforceability of international commercial settlement agreements reached through conciliation (“Enforceability Convention”) for the purpose of encouraging the use of conciliation in resolving international commercial disputes.  Read more
  • Impact of Article 43 of the Commercial Bank Law on PPP Projects

    With the widespread use of the PPP model in China, financing channels for PPP projects have also increasingly diversified.  Bank, trust, fund and insurance channels of capital have all rushed onto the stage of project financing. Subject to Article 43 of the Commercial Bank Law, banks, as the traditional big brother of financing, have always played the role of lender.  In practice, the opinions as to whether they can participate in the bidding on, and contributing capital to, PPP projects as private investors have been mixed.

    The current PPP tide in China driven by the Ministry of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission witnesses the transformation and upgrading of large state-owned enterprises.  These enterprises that have traditionally only been familiar with bid invitation, bid submission, and construction, have started to have an impact on numerous new areas such as project proposal and planning, company establishment and acquisition, fund establishment and operation, etc.  Certain state-owned enterprises that got their starts fairly early have cultivated teams with extensive experience in investing, and certain enterprises that are just starting up are selecting young talent from various entities in all out effort to catch up.  Private enterprises also participate enthusiastically.
  • Transfer Pricing – New Risks in Declaring Price Impact of Special Relationship to China Customs

    China Customs recently requires that the importer or exporter of record declare the impact on the import or export price of its special relationship with the counterpart (“Price Impact”). Specifically the declaring party must state whether its special relationship, if any, would affect the transaction value or price as declared to the China Customs. Previously the special relationship was an item of declaration subsequent to a specific request from the Customs. However, the impact of the special relationship was not an item of declaration, and the declaration party even had a general defense right to disprove such Price Impact. The Price Impact, if any, has been a pre-condition for  the Customs not to accept the declared transfer price for the purpose of ascertaining dutiable price of a given import or export shipment, in which case, China Customs shall re-value the given shipment according to China customs valuation rules.
  • New China Customs Taxation Policy on Cross-Border B2C E-Commerce Imports

    The Ministry of Finance, General Administration of Customs and State Administration of Taxation of China jointly issued a circular (“Joint Circular ”) relating to the taxation policy on the cross-border e-commerce retailing imports, with effect as from April 8, 2016.
  • ICC and CIETAC Arbitration Practice Comparison - Case Study Note 1

    One of the most important negotiated points by parties in contract negotiations is the dispute resolution clause. If parties agree on arbitration, they often negotiate which arbitration institution or arbitration rules will apply in resolving potential disputes.
  • Interpretation of New Anti-monopoly Provisions in the Field of Intellectual Property Rights:

    Ren Qing and Wu Peng, Partners in Zhong Lun Law Firm

    By Steve Zhao
  • Zhong Lun Advises Chinese Consortium on $1.9 Billion Acquisition of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

    On April 30, 2015, OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (OVTI, a Delaware company listed on NASDAQ) announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by a consortium composed of Hua Capital Management Co. Ltd. (“Hua Capital Management”), CITIC Capital Holdings Limited (“CITIC Capital”) and GoldStone Investment Co. Ltd. (“GoldStone Investment”) (collectively, the “Consortium”). Under the terms of the agreement, OmniVision stockholders will receive $29.75 per share in cash, or a total of approximately $1.9 billion. The agreement was unanimously approved by OmniVision’s Board of Directors.