The Legal 500

Work 01270 212000
Fax 01270 259727
Nantwich, Crewe

Hall Smith Whittingham LLP has high levels of expertise and professional achievement. This is no coincidence: the firm strives constantly for excellence.

The firm: The firm was formed in 2000 with the amalgamation of Arthur J S Hall & Co (Crewe) and Smith Whittingham (Nantwich), each firm highly regarded locally for their specialist expertise. Arthur J S Hall & Co specialised in family and litigation and Smith Whittingham specialised in agricultural, business and corporate work. Each firm also had strong private client work forged over many years. The merger enabled the combined firm to give up its criminal practice to concentrate on the extension and further specialisation of its other combined work areas. The firm is assured and confidently able to deal with all aspects of property, tax, succession planning and trust work to support its private clients, as well as all employer and employee work to support its business and corporate work.

Types of work undertaken: Hall Smith Whittingham has one sitting deputy district judges and one member with rights of audience in the civil higher courts.

The firm has four members of Resolution, each holding accredited specialist status, and members of the Law Society’s Children Panel dealing with highly complex and difficult public law childcare issues.

Jane Wilson, senior partner, has been elected to represent 6,000 family lawyers on Resolution’s National Committee and is chair of the Domestic Abuse Committee. She is also a member of the Parenting after Parting working group. Jane is the author of the Law Society’s book on domestic abuse, Practice and Precedents, which has already been cited as authority in cases.

Both Jane and Kay Masters are family mediators and Kay is also a qualified collaborative lawyer in family work and has sat as a deputy district judge for the last 15 years.

The development of Hall Smith Whittingham’s mediation service follows the firm’s philosophy of maintaining a high regard for developments and changes in family work and in all areas of the law.

The firm maintains strength of representation in family work, dispute resolution and litigation.

The commercial team deals with commercial development schemes and handles mergers and acquisitions, selling companies, management buyouts and takeovers, dissolutions and disputes. The commercial property department deals with commercial property for businesses and investors.

The probate, estate and trust team has members of Solicitors for the Elderly and Solicitor Trusts & Estate Practitioners. The team advises on the drafting of wills, the creation of and administration of trusts, property and financial lasting powers of attorney, health and welfare lasting powers of attorney, Court of Protection applications and the administration of estates. It also deals with elderly client issues, including advice on NHS Continuing Health Care assessments, care funding, care fees and asset protection measures, and care home agreements.

The dispute resolution team deals with court work, including contract and commercial disputes and injury claims and arranges mediation meetings where appropriate. The team have considerable expertise in employment law matters, including contracts, redundancy, dismissal and advice on discrimination.

Steven Coles has developed the firm’s residential conveyancing department into an efficient and friendly team that is highly regarded among local property professionals and with an excellent reputation. The department has accreditation from the Conveyancing Quality Scheme.

The firm has always been a front-runner in the development and use of IT in order to better promote its efficiency and service. It was one of the first locally to introduce an electronic accounting system (and even a fax machine!) and has maintained a forward-thinking approach to adopt the best useful developments. Some of its case management systems were written and developed in-house.

The firm offers the expertise provided by larger practices at moderate high-street cost. This helps to make it successful. The firm is proud of its reputation and avoids complacency with client satisfaction surveys. The results are published on its website. Over 97% of clients who respond (and most do) say they are sure to, or are likely to, recommend the firm to friends or family. Its significant source of new work comes from existing clients or client recommendations. Its business plan is based on quality and effective service. Its goal is client satisfaction, supporting its banner belief in fast, friendly and effective professionals.

Breakdown of work    %Conveyancing     20
Commercial     10
Family     20
Dispute resolution     10
Employment     10
Corporate and agricultural     10
Private client    20

Number of UK partners 5

Number of other UK fee-earners 18

Above material supplied by Hall Smith Whittingham LLP.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

    How to build an investment fraud defence case that disproves prosecution allegations of dishonesty.

    With a town council now officially facing a fraud investigation, we examine what individuals in such a large body should do if they come under suspicion.
  • The risks of liberation

    The dangers that pension liberation and money laundering pose to those involved in pension funds and management.

    What has been achieved since the introduction of the Act that was intended to tackle bribery in business?

    Five banks being fined £3.6 billion in the US for manipulating forex is a stark reminder of the legal risks involved in currency trading. Here, Aziz Rahman of Rahman Ravelli examines how the brokers and the traders in forex can avoid legal problems.
  • Foreign Intercepts

  • Finding the 
right words

    In the recent case of Newbury v Sun Microsystems [2013], the defendant argued that an offer to settle proceedings was ‘in principle' only and that a binding contract could not be formed until further terms had been agreed and a formal contract had been signed. It supported this argument by referring to a statement, in the offer letter, that the settlement was to be ‘recorded in a suitably worded agreement'. 

  • Behind the corporate veil: is that all there is?

    That companies have an existence entirely separate to that of their shareholders and directors is a foundational principle of English law and commerce.

  • Restoring environmental damage: putting a price on ecosystem services

    On 7 August 2009 a 40-inch pipeline ruptured, spilling 5,400 cubic metres of crude oil into the soil and groundwater of La Crau nature reserve in southern France, a habitat protected under French and European law. The operator had to excavate and replace 60,000 tons of soil, install 70 wells to pump and treat groundwater and 25 pumps to skim oil from surface water, at a cost in the region of €50m. However, this was just the primary remediation (that is, restoring the site to the state it would have been if the damage had not occurred). The operator was also required to compensate for the damage to the habitats and the loss of the ecosystem services that would otherwise have been provided by La Crau nature reserve. Measures included purchasing land outside of the nature reserve and contributing to its management for a period of 30 years (over €1m), monitoring the water table for 20 years (over €500,000), monitoring fauna over three years (€150,000) and rehabilitation in accordance with best available ecological techniques (nearly €2m). Overall, the compensatory restoration (to compensate for the amount of time that the ecosystem was impacted) and complimentary restoration (to compensate for elements of the ecosystem that had been permanently lost) came to more than €6.5m. 

  • The role of arbitrators in EU antitrust law

    In May 2014, it will be ten years since Regulation No 1/2003 entered into force. When the legislator of the European Union adopted this Regulation on 16 December 2002, its main objective was to decentralise the enforcement of the two main provisions of EU antitrust law, Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). Where do the arbitrators fit in this picture?