The Legal 500

Back to Legal500 home

Short Richardson & Forth LLP

4 MOSLEY STREET, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, NE1 1DE, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0191 232 0283
Fax:
Fax 0191 261 6956
DX:
61037 NEWCASTLE
Web:
www.short-richardson-forth.co.uk
Email:

What we say about the firm's legal practice in North

Dispute resolution

Within Commercial litigation: Newcastle, tier 4

Mark Green and Tim Berg jointly head the team at Short Richardson & Forth LLP, which is currently representing two former directors and 21 minority shareholders in substantial claims against co-directors and majority shareholders for obtaining a secret profit.

Within Debt recovery, Short Richardson & Forth LLP is a first tier firm,

Short Richardson & Forth LLP’s Mark Green continues to provide a debt collection service to regional and national clients.

Finance

Within Insolvency and corporate recovery , Short Richardson & Forth LLP is a third tier firm,

Tim Berg heads the insolvency team at Short Richardson & Forth LLP.

Human resources

Within Employment, Short Richardson & Forth LLP is a third tier firm,

Max Winthrop leads the ‘strong’ team at Short Richardson & Forth LLP, which continues to advise Esso Petroleum Company, and recently advised over 600 employees of Northumbria County Council on compromise agreements. Dr John McMullen has retired.

Overview

Real estate

Within Commercial property: Newcastle, tier 4

Short Richardson & Forth LLP’s David Richardson focuses on investment property and commercial property development, and Timothy Luckhurst-Matthews advises mainly on commercial lease transactions.

Further information on Short Richardson & Forth LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Short Richardson & Forth LLP in other jurisdictions.

North

Offices in Newcastle upon Tyne

Search News and Articles

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW

  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW

  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW

  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW

  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW

  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW

  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW

  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW

  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
    - Penningtons Solicitors LLP

  • Premium service for tier 2 and 5 sponsors to be launched

    A premium service for sponsors will be launched by the UKBA on 6 April 2012. The service is designed specifically for companies that sponsor international employees under tier 2 and 5 of the points based system and aims to provide them with enhanced support.
    - Penningtons Solicitors LLP
© 2012 www.legal500.com