The Legal 500

Work +65 6535 0733

Show all Press releases

Drew & Napier’s patents practice top tier in Singapore

February 2012

20 February 2012 - Drew & Napier LLC (“Drew”) is recognised once again by Managing Intellectual Property for its leading Intellectual Property (IP) practice. Drew ranked Tier One for both patents contentious and patents prosecution work in the annual Patent survey conducted by the noted IP publication.

The results were determined through interviews with clients and peers across more than 80 jurisdictions.

The Patents survey is part of a three-part series of surveys by Managing Intellectual Property.  The second and third parts of the survey cover trademark and copyright work and the results will be published in the March and April issues of the magazine. Drew’s trademark work has been consistently ranked top tier by the magazine for over a decade while its copyright work retained top spot for the past four years.  

Drew’s IP practice group is managed by directors Dedar Singh Gill and  Cecelia Girvin. 

For more information please contact:

Madhu Rai
Manager, Marketing & Communications
Tel: +65 6531 2482

Jason Tan
Senior Executive, Marketing & Communications (Corporate & Finance)
Tel: +65 6531 2425

About Drew & Napier LLC

Established in 1889, Drew & Napier LLC is one of Singapore's leading and largest law firms, with over 250 lawyers and fee-earners. Consistently rated top tier in dispute resolution over the years by international ranking organisations such as Asia Pacific Legal 500, Chambers Global, Practical Law Company, Best Lawyers and Asia Law, the firm has 7 Senior Counsel. The firm is headed by chief executive officer, Davinder Singh, Senior Counsel. Drew & Napier LLC is also rated top tier in Corporate Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property (Patents and Trademarks), Competition & Antitrust, Telecommunications, Media & Technology and Tax, with market leading practices in Mergers & Acquisitions, Corporate Finance, and Admiralty & Shipping. For more information, please visit

Legal Developments by:
Drew & Napier LLC

  • Competition Appeal Board Dismisses Most Grounds of Appeal by Modelling Agencies

    On 10 April 2013, the Competition Appeal Board (CAB) dismissed all but two grounds of appeal by five modelling agencies that had been found by the Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) to have engaged in price-fixing activities. CAB's decision resulted in a reduction in the total amount of financial penalties for the five modelling agencies.
    - Drew & Napier LLC

Legal Developments in Singapore

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • SGX Introduces Circuit Breakers and New Error Trade Policy in February 2014

    Following on from our July 2013 issue, the Singapore Exchange ( SGX ) has recently announced that it will be introducing circuit breakers in the securities market from 24 February 2014 as an additional market safeguard.
  • Singapore to Restrict Remote Gambling

    The Ministry of Home Affairs of Singapore ( MHA ) recently issued a public consultation paper seeking feedback on its proposals to restrict remote gambling in Singapore. Whilst the provision of gambling is prohibited in Singapore under the Common Gaming Houses Act and the Betting Act (unless specifically permitted by way of a licence or exemption), these laws do not expressly apply to remote gambling as they were enacted before the internet era.
  • Challenging Times: Attacks on an Arbitrator’s Impartiality

    The prospect of litigating in the local courts of one's counterparty can induce fear. Those courts may be perceived as inefficient or costly; their substantive and procedural laws may be unfamiliar or unpredictable in application; or their judiciary might not be (at least from one party's point of view) competent. Worst of all is the possibility of home-court bias against the foreign party: " there is little use in going to law with the devil while the court is held in hell ". [1]
  • SGX Enhancing Regulatory Tools in March 2014

    The Singapore Exchange ( SGX ) announced on 7 February 2014 that it is enhancing its regulatory tools in line with international standards, by refining its query process and introducing new requirements. The following is a summary of these enhancements which will take effect from 3 March 2014.
  • The Price of Winning: the Evolving Debate Surrounding Cost Recovery in Commercial Disputes

    Singapore, like many common law jurisdictions, permits a person to recover costs incurred in pursuing or defending a cause of action. At the risk of over-simplification, the winner is entitled to recover its costs from the loser. However, the amount of costs that the court orders the losing party to pay in a commercial case is subject to review by the court. In international arbitration, tribunals may also award costs to the winning party but, in contrast to litigation, the amount awarded is not subject to a court's review.
  • The Monetary Authority of Singapore’s Supervisory Oversight over Banks: Proposed Changes to the Ac

    On 28 November 2013, the Monetary Authority of Singapore ( MAS ) released its Consultation Paper on the Review of the Banking Act ( Consultation Paper ). These proposed amendments aim to strengthen MAS' supervisory oversight over banks and codify MAS' expectations as to the risk management policies that banks should have in place. A public consultation is open until 15 January 2014.
  • The Do Not Call Registry - A Missed Call?

    On 2 January 2014, the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 ( PDPA ) came into force. It is concerned with, among other things, messages advertising or promoting goods or services, or a business or investment opportunity. Those messages are called "specified messages". Any business that intends to send such messages to a Singapore telephone number must check if that number is listed in the Do Not Call Registry ( DNC Registry ). If it is, such messages cannot be sent, unless the subscriber in question has given clear and unambiguous consent to receive them. Failure to comply with the PDPA is a criminal offence, punishable by a fine of up to S$10,000.
  • Party Autonomy - Whither the Pendulum II

  • Proposed Amendments to the Companies Act–Public Consultation on 2nd Pt of Companies (Amendment) Bi

    The Ministry of Finance ( MOF ) and the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority ( ACRA ) are seeking public feedback on the second part of the draft Companies (Amendment) Bill covering legislative amendments in respect of foreign companies and other aspects of the Companies Act of Singapore. Public feedback is also being sought in respect of three new areas.
  • Direct Listing Framework – SGX as the Asian Gateway for Chinese Companies

    The Singapore Exchange ( SGX ) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission ( CSRC ) announced on 25 November 2013 that they will be establishing a direct listing framework which will allow for Chinese companies to list in Singapore.