The Legal 500

39 SAJIK-RO 8-GIL, JONGNO-GU, SEOUL 110-720, SOUTH KOREA
Tel:
Work +82 2 3703 1114
Email:
Web:
www.kimchang.com

Show all Press releases

Kim & Chang advised AB InBev in USD 1.8 bil sale of OB - PE Deal of the Year, IFLR Asian Awards 2010

March 2010

At Kim & Chang, we offer unrivaled expertise on all aspects of public and private M&A transactions in Korea . Our Mergers & Acquisitions Practice Group is widely recognized in Korea and throughout Asia as the best of its kind, and our preeminence in this practice area has been recognized over the years through the quality of our deals. The following is a summary of the firm’s recent engagements in 2009. 

 

 

In March 2009, Kim & Chang represented Doosan Corporation when it sold its entire liquor business group to Lotte Liquor BG Co., Ltd., a new entity established by Lotte Chilsung Beverage, for 503 billion KRW.

 

In June 2009, Kim & Chang represented eBay KTA (UK) Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of eBay Inc., in its US$1.21 billion acquisition of Gmarket Inc., a NASDAQ-listed leading retail e-commerce marketplace based in Seoul, Korea . This landmark transaction represents one of the largest cross-border tender offers for shares in a Korean company and employed an innovative structure to ensure compliance with U.S. and Korean securities and tax regulations. Kim & Chang and the Palo Alto-based law firm Cooley Godward Kronish LLP advised eBay on all aspects of the transaction, including M&A, employee benefits, intellectual property and tax matters.

 

Significantly, Kim & Chang's antitrust team successfully obtained approval for the transaction from the Korea Fair Trade Commission based on an analysis of benign effect on dynamic competition in the Korean retail e-commerce market.

 

In July 2009, Kim & Chang represented Anheuser-Busch InBev NV/SA, a Belgium based beer brewery, when it sold its 100% stake in Oriental Brewery Co., Ltd. for USD 1.8 billion with a call option with respect to 100% of Oriental Brewery Co., Ltd. and an earn-out tied to the performance of Oriental Brewery Co., Ltd.

 

In September 2009, Kim & Chang advised Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd. (“DHI”), Korea’s leading manufacturer of power plants, when, together with its Czech subsidiary Doosan Heavy Industries Czech a.s., it entered into a definitive agreement for the acquisition of 100% of the equity stake in Škoda Power a.s., a Czech steam turbine manufacturer, from Škoda Holding a.s for 450 million Euros. This transaction is noteworthy for being one of a very few cross-border acquisitions by a Korean company this year notwithstanding the challenges created by the recent global financial crisis.

 

In November 2009, Kim & Chang advised on Korean legal and regulatory issues relating to MagnaChip Semiconductor Ltd., a Korean semiconductor manufacturer, in connection with the debt and equity restructuring of its ultimate parent company MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and certain affiliates. MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and certain affiliate companies in the US successfully emerged from voluntary Chapter 11 restructuring which commenced in June 2009. Upon completion of the restructuring, MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and its affiliate companies significantly reduced their long-term debt (from approximately US$850 million to US$62 million), and Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. (“Avenue Capital”) became the controlling shareholder of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC.

 

In December 2009, Kim & Chang acted as counsel to VOGO Fund and Korea Global Fund when they acquired shares of BC Card from Hana Bank and SC First Bank for KRW 194 billion, with the goal of acquiring management rights of BC Card. 

 

Kim & Chang

SEYANG BUILDING, 223 NAEJA-DONG, JONGNO-GU, SEOUL 110-720

Tel: Work +82 2 3703 1114

Fax: Fax +82 2 737 9091

Web: www.kimchang.com

Email: lawkim@kimchang.com

Legal Developments by:
Kim & Chang

  • Proposed Legislation for Environmental Pollution Damage Compensation Has Passed National Assembly

    On December 10, 2014, the proposed legislation for the Environmental Pollution Damage Compensation and Recovery Act (the “Environmental Damage Compensation Act”) was passed by the National Assembly by unanimous votes of the present members. This Act will enter into force one year after the date of its promulgation, provided that, however, the obligation to subscribe environmental liability insurance under Article 17 will be enforced 18 months after tis promulgation.
    - Kim & Chang

Legal Developments in South Korea

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Proposed Legislation for Environmental Pollution Damage Compensation Has Passed National Assembly

    On December 10, 2014, the proposed legislation for the Environmental Pollution Damage Compensation and Recovery Act (the “Environmental Damage Compensation Act”) was passed by the National Assembly by unanimous votes of the present members. This Act will enter into force one year after the date of its promulgation, provided that, however, the obligation to subscribe environmental liability insurance under Article 17 will be enforced 18 months after tis promulgation.
  • [South Korea] Proposed Tax Law Changes for 2015

    On August 6, 2013, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance announced proposed tax law amendments for 2015, most of which would take effect on January 1, 2015 if enacted into law. The main items as currently proposed are summarized below but are subject to change during the National Assembly’s legislative review later this year.
  • [South Korea] Regulations on Subcontracting, Franchising and Distribution to be Amended

    On September 30, 2014, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (the “KFTC”) announced plans to amend regulations regarding the subcontracting, franchise and distribution sectors. In particular, the KFTC identified 12 action items that address the propriety and need for certain rules, and aim to mitigate burdens on industry. The KFTC plans to submit the relevant bills to the National Assembly and finalize the amended Enforcement Decrees by the end of 2014, and to update the subordinate regulations by the first quarter of 2015.
  • South Korea: Court Decisions Since the Supreme Court Rulings on Ordinary Wage

     
  • Court Decision on Collusion Case Regarding Compensation for Commission Rate Tied to Personal Life..

       Court Decision on Collusion Case Regarding Compensation for Commission Rate Tied to Personal Life Insurance Products   Following the Korea Fair Trade Commission (“KFTC”)’s correction order and imposition of administrative fines on December 15, 2011 against 16 life insurance companies for their engagement in unfair concerted action (cartel), consumers that purchased the insurance policies (the “Complainants”) brought a number of civil actions against these 16 life insurance companies.   On April 25, 2014, and on June 27, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court issued judgments on a number of these civil cases in favor of the life insurance companies on grounds that the aforementioned life insurance companies had not been conclusively found to have engaged in unfair concerted action.
  • Essilor’s Proposed Combination with an Optical Lens Maker in Korea is Blocked

    In its press release on March 17, 2014, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (the "KFTC") blocked the proposed acquisition of 50% shares by Essilor Amera Investment Pte. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Essilor International S.A., the largest optical lens maker in the world) in Daemyung Optical Co., Ltd. (the second largest optical lens maker in Korea) citing inter alia the likely lessening effect on price competition and the probable future abuses of the enhanced market power. On top of the expressed competitive concerns, the KFTC observed that allowing foreign firms to acquire local firms and turn them into their local sub-contractors worsens the competitive market structure of the domestic optical lens industry.
  • Recent Issues of Data Protection Regulation in Korea

    The Personal Information Protection Act ("PIPA") was enacted as a general law of personal information in March 2011 to fulfill the need for presiding rules to govern personal information protection. In fact, there have already been a number of special laws governing personal information protection in various special areas and cases, such as The Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization Information Protection ("Network Act") governing information and communications services, and the Use and Protection of Credit Information Act ("Credit Information Act") governing personal credit information. Special laws prevail over the general law, when in conflict with individual articles of the general law.
  • Comprehensive Measures to Protect Personal Data in the Financial Sector

    The following is a summary of the press releases made by the Financial Services Commission on 10 March 2014. These are action items and policies that the FSC and relevant ministries are seeking to implement. The following measures have developed from a series of measures previously announced since the data leakage from the three credit card companies were revealed last January.
  • Essilor’s Proposed Combination with an Optical Lens Maker in Korea is Blocked

    In its press release on March 17, 2014, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (the "KFTC") blocked the proposed acquisition of 50% shares by Essilor Amera Investment Pte. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Essilor International S.A., the largest optical lens maker in the world) in Daemyung Optical Co., Ltd. (the second largest optical lens maker in Korea) citing inter alia the likely lessening effect on price competition and the probable future abuses of the enhanced market power. On top of the expressed competitive concerns, the KFTC observed that allowing foreign firms to acquire local firms and turn them into their local sub-contractors worsens the competitive market structure of the domestic optical lens industry.
  • Ordinary Wage: After the 2013 Supreme Court Decision

    1. First Trial Court Decision on Employer's Good Faith Argument On December 18, 2013, the Supreme Court of Korea made an en banc decision that ordinary wage includes regularly paid fixed bonus amounts. The Supreme Court also expressly noted that if an employer is able to prove that (i) there is an agreement between the employer and the labor union that fixed bonuses are excluded from ordinary wages and (ii) paying employees for past underpayment of overtime wages will cause a substantial detriment to the management or a major threat to the existence of the company due to the unexpected financial burden, then employees' claims for past underpayment can be denied based on the principle of good faith. However, the Supreme Court did not provide specific criteria for such denial, which caused controversy over the definite scope of application of its judgment (please refer to our newsletter of December 19, 2013 in this regard).