The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
8 UPPER GROSVENOR STREET, LONDON, W1K 2LY, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7499 5599
Fax:
Fax 020 7495 2970
Email:
Web:
www.searstooth.co.uk

This central London firm is a leading family law practice known for specialising in high-net-worth and complex financial disputes.

The firm: Established in 1982, Sears Tooth is recognised as a centre of excellence and undertakes a significant proportion of the most complex financial cases held in the High Court. It is also highly regarded for its breadth of experience in complex children matters and international family law. The firm takes on cases involving difficult or novel points of law and has an enviable track record of winning ground-breaking cases and obtaining leading family law judgments. It is known for having a tenacious no-nonsense approach and is not averse to taking court proceedings to achieve that result.

Raymond Tooth, the senior partner, was awarded the Spears Lifetime Achievement Award for outstanding contributions to private client services and he and his partner Susan Apthorp are listed among the UK's leading family lawyers. Clients appreciate the fact that both partners take a 'hands on approach' whether the case requires robust negotiation or hard-hitting litigation.

Types of work undertaken: Its expertise is wide-ranging including divorce, pre- and post-nuptial agreements, separation, and provision for unmarried parents, paternity disputes, contact, residence and international relocation cases. In addition it is renowned for protecting its clients using a wide range of emergency procedures in multiple jurisdictions including freezing and disclosure orders relating to both personal assets and assets held in offshore trusts. The firm's client base is wide-ranging including celebrities, professionals, entrepreneurs and ultra-high-net-worth individuals.

  • Number of UK partners: 2
  • Number of other UK fee-earners: 6
  • Breakdown of work %
  • ‚Ä©
  • Family: 100

‚Ä©

Above material supplied by Sears Tooth.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.