The Legal 500

5 KING STREET CLOISTERS, CLIFTON WALK, HAMMERSMITH, LONDON, W6 0GY, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 8563 9797
Fax:
Fax 020 8563 9798
Web:
www.lansbury-worthington.co.uk
Email:

Lansbury Worthington is a rising criminal defence law firm specialising in commercial and business fraud, regulatory offences, serious and general crime, extradition and prison law, as well certain specific civil law areas (personal injury, actions against the police, and employment law).

The firm: Established in 1999, the firm has grown steadily to become one of the larger criminal law specialist firms in London and the UK. Its aim is to provide the highest level of expertise at an affordable price and in an approachable manner. The firm is based in Hammersmith, west London, but also has consulting rooms in central London (107-111 Fleet Street, EC4).

Types of work undertaken: Commercial and business fraud: the firm has developed considerable expertise in serious high value business fraud cases, and in particular has been involved with several of the numerous Operation Swale Home Office visa fraud prosecutions (including the lead case). It is authorised by the Legal Services Commission to run VHCC (very high cost case) contracts, which regime has effectively replaced the Serious Fraud Panel. The VHCC team is led by Charles Worthington.

Regulatory offences: it has substantial expertise in recent DEFRA and HSE prosecutions of both companies and individuals, having run such cases under the VHCC regime, and has represented individuals facing disciplinary proceedings before the BMA and SRA.

Serious and general crime: the firm has considerable experience in this area, and is able to offer specialist advice and representation on everything from murder to speeding. The firm thinks that much can be achieved by providing timely and insightful advice before or at the police station/investigation stage, and that this is a crucial moment for clients to choose the right legal team. A number of clients have had significant public profiles (whether in the entertainment or sports worlds) and have required a particular understanding of discretion and profile management.

Extradition: Lansbury Worthington is able to advise and represent clients facing extradition to foreign jurisdictions under the leadership of Giovanna Fiorentino, head of its extradition department. The firm has lawyers fluent in Italian, Polish, Russian, Romanian, Spanish and Turkish, and has established strong links with law firms in Poland, Romania and Italy.

Prison law: Susan Twyman is a leading prison law specialist in the UK and has established a growing reputation in this field.

Money laundering and asset seizure: the Crown increasingly is using its powers under the Proceeds of Crime Act to seize and retain purported criminal assets in a wide variety of cases. Additionally, police and similar agencies are seizing assets pending investigation, often causing significant financial hardship to those affected. The firm has established links with specialist financial experts, and has had some notable successes in recovering seized assets on behalf of clients, and in reducing substantially the claimed benefit figures in confiscation proceedings.

Civil law (private client): it has a thriving civil law department dealing specifically with personal injury, actions against the police and employment law. In conjunction with its prison law department, the firm has developed particular expertise in advising on tariff and IPPs (indeterminate public protection sentences), and on the consequences of the prison service failing to provide appropriate facilities for clients to comply with such sentences.

Breakdown of work %
Serious fraud/VHCC 40
Crime 40
Personal injury 15
Employment 5

Number of UK partners 4
Number of other UK fee-earners 36

Above material supplied by Lansbury Worthington Solicitors.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
  • Premium service for tier 2 and 5 sponsors to be launched

    A premium service for sponsors will be launched by the UKBA on 6 April 2012. The service is designed specifically for companies that sponsor international employees under tier 2 and 5 of the points based system and aims to provide them with enhanced support.