The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Stowe Family Law LLP


East Midlands: Private client

Family
Family - ranked: tier 4

Stowe Family Law LLP

Sushma Kotecha and Maria Coster are new names to Stowe Family Law LLP, following the recent opening of the firm’s Nottingham office. The pair joined from Shoosmiths LLP and John Hooper & Co respectively. They cover all types of family law issues, including divorce, prenuptial agreements, financial settlements and investigations, cohabitation, grandparents’ rights and international child abduction. Specific experience is held in relation to matters involving individuals with high incomes, businesses and trusts.

Practice head(s):Sushma Kotecha;

Other key lawyers:Maria Coster;

Testimonials

'Maria Coster is always easily accessible and gives a measured and insightful opinion. Her expertise cannot be praised enough and she is highly recommended'.

'Approachable and professional practice that has the client's interest at heart'.

'Stowe Family Law are forward thinking and are not short of new, exciting ideas of how family law should be in the ever evolving market'.

'Sushma Kotecha leads the team with fresh, innovative ideas. She is very pragmatic in her approach to cases, always thinking outside the box. Maria Coster has a great head on young shoulders. Her advice and views on cases are much wiser than others of her experience'.

'Sushma Kotecha is a strong advocate, experienced, committed and a worthy opponent. She is committed to her clients and highly regarded as a solicitor and family mediator. Maria Coster is well liked and highly regarded locally'.

'The family team are thoroughly prepared and deal with complex financial remedy issues'.

'Sushma Kotecha is straight talking, pragmatic and knowledgeable'.

Rising stars

Maria Coster - Stowe Family Law LLP

[back to top]


Further information on Stowe Family Law LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Stowe Family Law LLP in other jurisdictions.

East Midlands

Offices in Nottingham

London

Offices in London WC1V and London London

North West

Offices in Altrincham, Manchester, and Wilmslow

South East

Offices in Esher, Reading, Tunbridge Wells, St Albans, and Winchester

Yorkshire and the Humber

Offices in Harrogate, Beverley, Ilkley, Leeds, and Wetherby

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.