The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Stowe Family Law LLP

Work 0203 0967077

London: Private client

Family - ranked: tier 4

Stowe Family Law LLP

Stowe Family Law LLP is a large specialist firm of family solicitors with 18 offices nationwide. In London the team has an arbitrator, mediators and collaborative lawyers. The team has strength in resolving complex financial disputes as well as international matters. It also has lawyers who specialise in dealing with disputes regarding the arrangements for children and the firm has developed a specialist practice in relation to surrogacy. Gavin Scott and Phoebe Turner head the team. Graham Coy is another known name for his work on various issues such as pre- and post-nuptial agreements as well as cohabitee disputes and financial claims under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989.

Practice head(s):Gavin Scott; Phoebe Turner

Other key lawyers:Graham Coy; Joanna Kay


'Stowe Family Law LLP has some very good family solicitors. Being niche, the lawyers have a high level of expertise in their area'.

'Gavin Scott and his team collaborate to get maximum results'.

'Graham Coy is a seasoned, experienced and very talented solicitor who will get you a fantastic result in every case'.

'Graham Coy is diligent and has good attention to detail'.

'Joanna Kay is a very astute litigator. She's a tough negotiator but she can see the wood for the trees meaning she doesn't run bad points. In turn, that means clients are getting real value for money and a highly focused service'.

'Joanna Kay is very bright and very able'.

Work highlights

  • Representing a wife in proceedings with assets of up to £5m.
  • Advising on disputed proceedings between the parents with regard to their children and Hague Convention matters.
  • Representing the husband who lacked capacity to deal with proceedings and where the wife refused to comply with court orders.
  • Advising on enforcement orders made after a Russian divorce involving ultra-high-net-worth individuals.
  • Representing a husband, a member of the clergy, whose wife had various health difficulties and where the husband had a substantial inheritance.

[back to top]

Further information on Stowe Family Law LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Stowe Family Law LLP in other jurisdictions.

East Midlands

Offices in Nottingham


Offices in London WC1V and London London

North West

Offices in Altrincham, Manchester, and Wilmslow

South East

Offices in Esher, Reading, Tunbridge Wells, St Albans, and Winchester

Yorkshire and the Humber

Offices in Harrogate, Beverley, Ilkley, Leeds, and Wetherby

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.