The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon


Corporate and M&A
Corporate and M&A - ranked: tier 5

Marinovic & Asociados

Marinovic & Asociados 'gets to know its clients' business'. The firm is particularly focused on corporate and real estate law, natural resources, projects and sports law. Active clients include Grupo Magal, Rubis Energie, Fynpal and Easy Taxi; and recent matters include assisting Grupo Moncuri with real estate and energy projects, including the development of a solar plant. Martín Vilajuana de la Cuadra, who 'provides a great service', and Alberto Polette Zaldívar are the key names; associate Tomás Polette Zaldívar was hired from CMS Carey & Allende.

[back to top]

Dispute resolution
Dispute resolution - ranked: tier 5

Marinovic & Asociados

Marinovic & Asociados has 'easy-to-engage-with multilingual partners and staff'; the practice assists with complex civil and commercial litigation,  shareholder disputes, insolvency, environment and construction-related claims, and tax matters. Iván Marinovic Pacey heads the group; Nicolás Marinovic Vial and Javier González Echávarri  are also key contacts. Clients include Grupo La Polar, Rubis Energie and Cabify Chile.

[back to top]

Real estate
Real estate - ranked: tier 4

Marinovic & Asociados

Marinovic & Asociados is 'always up to date with any changes in law or procedures, and its analytical abilities are strong; the firm's lawyers are also hardworking and very honest'. The practice covers acquisitions, sales, property financing, real estate litigation, urban planning and development, among other specializations; it recently assisted Boetsch Group with development-related property acquisitions. Juan Carlos Méndez Montero 'always answers clients' calls and messages no matter the time of day'.

[back to top]

Further information on Marinovic & Alcalde Abogados

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Marinovic & Alcalde Abogados in other jurisdictions.


Offices in Las Condes

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Communiqu√© on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (‚Äú CMB ‚ÄĚ) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft Communiqu√© on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the Communiqu√© on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (‚Äú Communiqu√© ‚ÄĚ), on October 3, 2019. The Communiqu√© entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (‚ÄúFTS‚ÄĚ) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept.¬†
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the ‚ÄúDanish Beneficial Ownership Cases‚ÄĚ, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.