The Legal 500

30 KING STREET, LONDON, EC2V 8EE, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7600 3800
Fax:
Fax 020 3465 4400
DX:
DX 138754 CHEAPSIDE
Web:
www.maplesteesdale.co.uk
Email:

What we say about the firm's legal practice in London

Real estate

Within Commercial property, tier 4

Maples Teesdale LLP is ‘absolutely first rate: provides expert, pertinent advice, and is enjoyable to work with’. It is strong for investment work, and also continues to be instructed by the US government regarding its ongoing embassy relocation. Declan Power, Chris Wilkinson and Katherine Watts are ‘all very good and commercially aware’, and the ‘responsiveRoger Thornton is also recommended.

Within Construction, tier 5

Maples Teesdale LLP is ‘knowledgeable and highly focused on property’, and ‘very responsive’. The practice, which focuses on non-contentious work, recently advised the UK Commercial Property Trust on the construction aspects of sale and purchase transactions for three shopping centres in Shrewsbury. Paul Matcham is ‘unbelievably efficient’, and ‘terrier-like in chasing up matters’.

Within Property finance, tier 4

Maples Teesdale LLP’s ‘advice is intuitive, commercial and practical, with partner involvement throughout’. Clients include Lloyds TSB Bank, RBS and Nationwide Building Society. Neil Sagoostands out as having an in-depth knowledge of property law with a very practical approach’, and Roger Thornton is also recommended.

Within Property litigation, tier 4

Maples Teesdale LLP is commercial, ‘good value for money’ and ‘absolutely first rate’. It won a £5m dilapidation claim for RSA. Practice head David Stevens is ‘able to drill down through a mass of facts to get to the essential points. He is bright, thoughtful and articulate’.


Further information on Maples Teesdale LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Maples Teesdale LLP in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
  • Premium service for tier 2 and 5 sponsors to be launched

    A premium service for sponsors will be launched by the UKBA on 6 April 2012. The service is designed specifically for companies that sponsor international employees under tier 2 and 5 of the points based system and aims to provide them with enhanced support.