The Legal 500

KNIGHTS QUARTER, 14 ST JOHN'S LANE, LONDON, EC1M 4AJ, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7814 1200
Fax:
Fax 020 7490 2288
DX:
22 LONDON CHANCERY LANE WC2
Web:
www.kingsleynapley.co.uk
Email:

Miranda Baker

Tel:
Work +44 20 7814 1200
Email:
Kingsley Napley LLP

Work Department

Family.

Position

Partner, specialising in all aspects of private family work, with a particular interest in high-net-worth financial work and children cases (contested residence, contact and leave to remove applications), surrogacy and mediation; represented the wife in the case of K v L [2010] EWHC 1234 – an important case dealing with the treatment of a substantial premarital inheritance, which has recently gone to the Court of Appeal (judgment awaited), and also represented the successful respondent in the case of Re D (Minors) (Conciliation: Privilege) (1993) 2 All ER 693. Resolution (formerly SFLA) trained mediator.

Career

Articled Turner Peacock; qualified 1981; previously worked for Collyer-Bristow, Rubinstein Callingham Polden & Gale (partner from 1989-94), and Manches; member of the Resolution children committee; former co-editor of the ‘Resolution Review’; contributor to legal education videos; lectured on family law matters, including SFLA seminar on children, SFLA National Conference 2003 (co-wrote and shared presentation of children law update lecture), CLT ‘Alternative Family’ lecture in February 2006 (wrote and delivered lecture on surrogacy), and talk at international surrogacy seminar at Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in November 2010.

Languages

Conversational German.

Member

Resolution; Law Society.

Education

Wimbledon High School, GPDST; New Hall, Cambridge (1974-77).

Leisure

Opera, hiking, football, travel.

Practice Areas

Family - children; Family - matrimonial

Back to index

Legal Developments by:
Kingsley Napley LLP

  • Financial assistance: whitewashed by the Companies Act 2006

    Undoubtedly, the most eagerly awaited provision contained in the most recent Companies Act 2006 (the 2006 Act) implementation in October 2008 was that in relation to financial assistance. One of the overall aims of the 2006 Act was to significantly reduce the administrative burdens involved with running a company. To what extent have the changes to the financial assistance regime eased the regulatory burdens on directors and the workload of their lawyers?
    - Kingsley Napley

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to