The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

GRP Rainer LLP

Work +49 221 272 27 50
Fax +49 221 272 27 52 4
Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg and 3 more

Show all Press releases

Breach of duty by management – Special audit in cases involving a GmbH

August 2018

If there is reason to suspect that management has breached its duties, the shareholders of a GmbH, a type of a German private limited company, can request that a special audit be carried out.

We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte note that the responsibilities of the shareholders of a GmbH include approving the annual financial statement as well as scrutinizing and monitoring management. In a judgment from December 14, 2017, the Oberlandesgericht (OLG) München, the Higher Regional Court of Munich, ruled that the right to scrutinize and monitor management also encompasses the right to appoint special auditors (Az.: 23 U 1481/17).

According to the OLG München’s ruling, a special audit is only impermissible if the application for its implementation is unlawful and constitutes a breach of a fiduciary duty by the shareholder filing the application. Moreover, the implicated shareholder has no voting rights in relation to the preparatory actions and decisions taken in respect of a special audit.

If shareholders of a GmbH are concerned that management has breached its duties, they can request a special audit. For the purposes of adopting a resolution, a simple majority is sufficient. In the case before the OLG München, two families with equal shares in a GmbH & Co. KG, a type of limited partnership with a GmbH as general partner, as well as a Komplementär-GmbH, a.k.a. a general partner GmbH, had fallen out. One of the families filed for a special audit and later voted in favour of this measure, whereas the other family voted against it. The managing director was not entitled to vote and the resolution concerning a special audit was passed.

The managing director then raised a legal complaint against this. However, the lawsuit was largely unsuccessful. The OLG München held that the shareholders of a GmbH are entitled to appoint special auditors. It ruled that in order for this to happen it is necessary for a tangible cause informed by the facts and circumstances to be presented to the general meeting of the shareholders. The Court noted that the suspicion of a breach of duty by management must follow from these facts and circumstances. Furthermore, the special audit must prove to be expedient in the form in which it was specifically requested. The Court went on to say that a special audit is only impermissible if the application is unlawful and constitutes a breach of a fiduciary duty by the shareholder filing the application.

Disputes among the shareholders of a GmbH are a regular occurrence. If these differences of opinion cannot be cleared up, lawyers who are experienced in the field of company law can offer advice and recommend targeted resolutions.

Click here for more information.

Legal Developments by:
GRP Rainer LLP

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • LAG Düsseldorf: Dismissal with immediate effect valid in response to threat

    Anyone who seriously threatens their employer or superior should expect to be dismissed with immediate effect. This was confirmed by a ruling of the Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG) Düsseldorf [Regional Labour Court of Düsseldorf] from June 8, 2017 (Az.: 11 Sa 823/16).
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • GSK Update: AIFM Marketing in Germany - The clock is ticking for U.S. and other non-EU fund managers

    Our GSK Update informs about the impact of recent German investment fund legislation (UCITS V Implementation Act) for AIF managers, who are not domiciled in the EU (“non-EU-AIFM”) and who seek to market AIF shares in Germany in accordance with applicable German investment fund law under the EU-AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU).
  • GSK expands Luxembourg presence with a new tax partner

    Opened at the beginning of March 2016, GSK Stockmann + Kollegen continues to expand its Luxembourg office. Mathilde Ostertag recently joined the Luxembourg team of Equity Partners Dr. Marcus Peter, Andreas Heinzmann and Dr. Philipp Mößner as Local Tax Partner.
  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
  • New Top Level Domains – Noerr expert warns against trademark infringements

    On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".
    - Noerr
  • No obligation to set up filtering systems in order to prevent copyright violations

    ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
  • Further ECJ Ruling concerning NGO’s right of action under German environmental law

    For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
  • Lessons in Cross-Border M & A Transactions

    The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
  • Priority rental rights in insolvency

    Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.