The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

GRP Rainer LLP

AUGUSTINERSTRAßE 10, 50667 COLOGNE, GERMANY
Tel:
Work +49 221 272 27 50
Fax:
Fax +49 221 272 27 52 4
Email:
Web:
www.grprainer.com
Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg and 3 more

Show all Press releases

GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte – Experience with right of authorized dealer to claim compensation

August 2018

Like commercial agents, authorized dealers may also be entitled to claim compensation after the relevant agreement has been terminated. For this to happen, certain conditions need to be fulfilled.

Unlike commercial agents, authorized dealers operate under their own name and for their own account. The latter markets another company’s products under its own name, whereas a commercial agent enters into agreements and transactions on behalf of the company. In return, the commercial agent receives commission and is normally entitled to claim compensation once the commercial agency agreement has been terminated. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte note that authorized dealers can also be entitled to this right to claim compensation under certain circumstances.

The reasoning behind the commercial agent’s right to claim compensation is that he has established business contacts which the company will continue to benefit from even after the agreement has been terminated and without having to continue paying commission. While the authorized dealer conducts business under their own name and bears the associated entrepreneurial risk, he might nonetheless be entitled to claim appropriate compensation from his contractual partner pursuant to sec. 89 b) of the Handelsgesetzbuch (HGB), i.e. the German Commercial Code.

One of the conditions for the analogous application of sec. 89 b) HGB entails the authorized dealer having committed to transfer their client base to the contractual partner, with the result that the latter can continue to benefit from the client data even after the agreement has been terminated. The authorized dealer should also be involved in the company’s marketing in a similar fashion to a commercial agent. He needs to be involved to the extent that he has extensive obligations to perform commercially-relevant tasks that are otherwise assigned to a commercial agent (BGH, VII ZR 315/13).

According to the provisions of sec. 89 b) HGB, the authorized dealer’s right to claim compensation cannot be excluded in advance. This applies both to authorized dealers operating in Germany as well as, following another ruling of the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Supreme Court, those operating within the EU or the EEA (ruling from February 25, 2016, Az.: VII ZR 102/15).

Authorized dealers may therefore be entitled to claim compensation, but certain conditions need to be fulfilled for this to happen. Lawyers who are experienced in the field of commercial law can serve as expert advisors in the event of legal disputes and when drafting agreements.

Click here for more information.

Legal Developments by:
GRP Rainer LLP

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • LAG Düsseldorf: Dismissal with immediate effect valid in response to threat

    Anyone who seriously threatens their employer or superior should expect to be dismissed with immediate effect. This was confirmed by a ruling of the Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG) Düsseldorf [Regional Labour Court of Düsseldorf] from June 8, 2017 (Az.: 11 Sa 823/16).
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • GSK Update: AIFM Marketing in Germany - The clock is ticking for U.S. and other non-EU fund managers

    Our GSK Update informs about the impact of recent German investment fund legislation (UCITS V Implementation Act) for AIF managers, who are not domiciled in the EU (“non-EU-AIFM”) and who seek to market AIF shares in Germany in accordance with applicable German investment fund law under the EU-AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU).
  • GSK expands Luxembourg presence with a new tax partner

    Opened at the beginning of March 2016, GSK Stockmann + Kollegen continues to expand its Luxembourg office. Mathilde Ostertag recently joined the Luxembourg team of Equity Partners Dr. Marcus Peter, Andreas Heinzmann and Dr. Philipp Mößner as Local Tax Partner.
  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
  • New Top Level Domains – Noerr expert warns against trademark infringements

    On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".
    - Noerr
  • No obligation to set up filtering systems in order to prevent copyright violations

    ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
  • Further ECJ Ruling concerning NGO’s right of action under German environmental law

    For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
  • Lessons in Cross-Border M & A Transactions

    The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
  • Priority rental rights in insolvency

    Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.