The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

GRP Rainer LLP

AUGUSTINERSTRAĂźE 10, 50667 COLOGNE, GERMANY
Tel:
Work +49 221 272 27 50
Fax:
Fax +49 221 272 27 52 4
Email:
Web:
www.grprainer.com
Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg and 3 more

Show all Press releases

BGH on illegal health claims in the context of advertising food items

August 2017

In its ruling of March 29, 2017, the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Supreme Court, clarified once again that health claims cannot pertain to products and must relate to substances (Az.: I ZR 71/16).

When it comes to promoting foods and foodstuffs with health claims, companies must take care to ensure that the claims do not relate to the product as a whole but instead refer to specific ingredients with respect to which the statement has been approved or the statements are supported by sufficient scientific evidence. Otherwise, we at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte note that such claims may violate the Health Claims Regulation as well as competition law.

In its judgment of March 10, 2016, the Oberlandesgericht (OLG) Celle [Higher Regional Court of Celle] had prohibited a tea producer from using the term “detox” as a health claim in relation to a herbal tea comprising various ingredients including stinging nettle, green tea, peppermint and several others (Az.: 13 U 77/15), but granted leave to appeal to the BGH. The Bundesgerichtshof’s 1st Civil Panel strongly indicated in its ruling of March 29, 2017 that it intended to dismiss the appeal.

The Panel clarified that health claims pertaining to foods and foodstuffs are only allowed to refer to substances and not the product as a whole. In the instant case, the herbal tea consisting of up to 20 per cent stinging nettle and green tea each had been promoted using the term “detox”. According to the Panel, consumers were said to perceive “detox” as a health claim. It went on to say that there is always a presumption that a statement or term is a health claim if it is implied that consuming the food item in question will lead to an improved state of health. It was said that the term “detox” would be understood as referring to the entire product and not merely the ingredients stinging nettle and green tea. The BGH followed the OLG Celle’s line of reasoning. Appeal proceedings have since been settled by way of a ruling from June 13, 2017 dismissing them.

Advertising is often a bit of a tightrope walk for businesses, it being possible for violations of competition law to occur. This is particularly true in relation to advertising and statements pertaining to foods. Violations can give rise to formal warnings, damages claims and injunction suits. Lawyers who are versed in the field of competition law can assist companies in fending off or enforcing claims arising from violations of competition law.

https://www.grprainer.com/en/legal-advice/intellectual-property-law-and-trademark-law/advertising.html

Legal Developments by:
GRP Rainer LLP

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • LAG DĂĽsseldorf: Dismissal with immediate effect valid in response to threat

    Anyone who seriously threatens their employer or superior should expect to be dismissed with immediate effect. This was confirmed by a ruling of the Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG) DĂĽsseldorf [Regional Labour Court of DĂĽsseldorf] from June 8, 2017 (Az.: 11 Sa 823/16).
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • GSK Update: AIFM Marketing in Germany - The clock is ticking for U.S. and other non-EU fund managers

    Our GSK Update informs about the impact of recent German investment fund legislation (UCITS V Implementation Act) for AIF managers, who are not domiciled in the EU (“non-EU-AIFM”) and who seek to market AIF shares in Germany in accordance with applicable German investment fund law under the EU-AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU).
  • GSK expands Luxembourg presence with a new tax partner

    Opened at the beginning of March 2016, GSK Stockmann + Kollegen continues to expand its Luxembourg office. Mathilde Ostertag recently joined the Luxembourg team of Equity Partners Dr. Marcus Peter, Andreas Heinzmann and Dr. Philipp Mößner as Local Tax Partner.
  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
  • New Top Level Domains – Noerr expert warns against trademark infringements

    On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".
    - Noerr
  • No obligation to set up filtering systems in order to prevent copyright violations

    ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
  • Further ECJ Ruling concerning NGO’s right of action under German environmental law

    For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
  • Lessons in Cross-Border M & A Transactions

    The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
  • Priority rental rights in insolvency

    Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.