The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

GRP Rainer LLP

AUGUSTINERSTRAĂźE 10, 50667 COLOGNE, GERMANY
Tel:
Work +49 221 272 27 50
Fax:
Fax +49 221 272 27 52 4
Email:
Web:
www.grprainer.com
Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg and 3 more

Show all Press releases

Dismissal with immediate effect after constantly working up working hours deficit

August 2017

Flexible working hours are commonplace in many companies today. Notwithstanding this, employees must perform the work they owe to their employer pursuant to their employment contract, otherwise they may be faced with exceptional notice of dismissal.

A lot of companies have since moved away from a system of rigid working hours and now offer flexible working hours. That being said, the working hours owed by an employee, among other things, are agreed and laid out in his employment contract. Employees have to fulfil this contractual obligation and are not allowed to constantly build up their working hours deficit. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte note that if an employee fails to perform the work as stipulated in the employment contract, this may constitute good cause justifying exceptional notice of dismissal.

Such were the circumstances that led to the Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG) Hamburg [Regional Labour Court of Hamburg] upholding the effectiveness of a notice of exceptional dismissal in its ruling of November 2, 2016. The notice was issued because the employee in question had continuously worked up his working hours deficit again and again (Az.: 5 Sa 19/16).

In the instant case, the employment relationship had already existed for a period of more than 20 years. Based on a collective wage agreement, the employer could only terminate the employment relationship if it had good cause for doing so. Over the years, disputes repeatedly arose between employer and employee for a variety of reasons. In addition, the employer had already issued various formal warnings. The employer had also rebuked the employee on a number of occasions because the latter’s working time account was regularly in deficit. However, the employee failed to work off his deficit and instead continued to further contribute towards this. In the end, he had worked up a deficit of just under 56 hours, despite the fact that he had agreed to a mere 20 hours with his employer. In consultation with the staff council, the employer finally issued notice of dismissal with immediate effect.

The employee’s legal action opposing his dismissal was unsuccessful before the LAG Hamburg. The Court held that notice of dismissal with immediate effect had been effective. It stated that performing the work owed pursuant to the employment contract is one of an employee’s main obligations, a breach of which constitutes good cause justifying exceptional notice of dismissal. In the case in question, the employee was said to have failed to work off his working hours deficit despite repeatedly being called on to do so and instead continued to contribute towards this. The Court went on to say that a less severe reaction in the form of a formal warning would no longer have been sufficient in response to the employee’s misconduct. The LAG concluded that it was no longer reasonable to expect the employer to continue the employment relationship.

Whether exceptional notice of dismissal is effective or not always comes down to the circumstances of each individual case. Accordingly, notices ought to be thoroughly prepared. Lawyers who are experienced in the field of employment law can advise employers.

https://www.grprainer.com/en/legal-advice/employment-law.html

Legal Developments by:
GRP Rainer LLP

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • LAG DĂĽsseldorf: Dismissal with immediate effect valid in response to threat

    Anyone who seriously threatens their employer or superior should expect to be dismissed with immediate effect. This was confirmed by a ruling of the Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG) DĂĽsseldorf [Regional Labour Court of DĂĽsseldorf] from June 8, 2017 (Az.: 11 Sa 823/16).
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • GSK Update: AIFM Marketing in Germany - The clock is ticking for U.S. and other non-EU fund managers

    Our GSK Update informs about the impact of recent German investment fund legislation (UCITS V Implementation Act) for AIF managers, who are not domiciled in the EU (“non-EU-AIFM”) and who seek to market AIF shares in Germany in accordance with applicable German investment fund law under the EU-AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU).
  • GSK expands Luxembourg presence with a new tax partner

    Opened at the beginning of March 2016, GSK Stockmann + Kollegen continues to expand its Luxembourg office. Mathilde Ostertag recently joined the Luxembourg team of Equity Partners Dr. Marcus Peter, Andreas Heinzmann and Dr. Philipp Mößner as Local Tax Partner.
  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
  • New Top Level Domains – Noerr expert warns against trademark infringements

    On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".
    - Noerr
  • No obligation to set up filtering systems in order to prevent copyright violations

    ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
  • Further ECJ Ruling concerning NGO’s right of action under German environmental law

    For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
  • Lessons in Cross-Border M & A Transactions

    The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
  • Priority rental rights in insolvency

    Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.