The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

GRP Rainer LLP

AUGUSTINERSTRAßE 10, 50667 COLOGNE, GERMANY
Tel:
Work +49 221 272 2750
Fax:
Fax +49 221 2722 7524
Email:
Web:
www.grprainer.com
Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg and 3 more

Show all Press releases

LAG Rheinland-Pfalz: Dismissal with immediate effect for causing serious offence valid

February 2017

Seriously offending one’s work colleagues constitutes good cause justifying exceptional notice of dismissal with immediate effect. That was the verdict of the Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG) Rheinland-Pfalz [Regional Labour Court of Rhineland-Palatinate] (Az.: 4 Sa 350/15).

GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: Even if there is a relaxed atmosphere at a given workplace, boundaries still need to be observed. Seriously offending work colleagues, for instance, cannot be justified with reference to an easy-going atmosphere. On the contrary, it may result in exceptional notice of dismissal with immediate effect, as demonstrated by a ruling of the Landesarbeitsgericht Mainz from May 18, 2016.

In the instant case, a nurse had received both exceptional notice of dismissal with immediate effect and, in the alternative, ordinary notice of dismissal. She had seriously offended a colleague multiple times in a text. This wasn’t the first time that the nurse had drawn attention to herself, having already received a formal written warning for causing offence, among other things. Her action for unfair dismissal was unsuccessful.

The LAG Rheinland-Pfalz held that there had been good cause rendering dismissal with immediate effect effective, stating that seriously insulting one’s work colleagues could constitute a severe violation of an employee’s duties and is in and of itself sufficient to justify exceptional notice of dismissal with immediate effect. The Court ruled that in view of the severity of the breach of duty, the present case did not require a previous formal warning. Nonetheless, the nurse had already received a formal warning for similar conduct. Moreover, after weighing up the respective interests, there was still no grounds for precluding exceptional notice of dismissal. The Court went on to say that while the nurse’s nearly 20 years with the employer spoke in her favour, an employer cannot be expected to tolerate causing serious affront to work colleagues. It stated that the nurse’s conduct was liable to irreparably damage peace within the workplace. Taking into account all of the circumstances, the Court concluded that it was no longer reasonable to expect the employer to continue the employment relationship, not even until the notice period of dismissal had expired.

Notwithstanding this, whether exceptional notice of dismissal with immediate effect is effective is always a decision that is made on a case-by-case basis. The decisive factor is the weighing up of interests. If more weight ought to be given to the employer’s interest in terminating the employment relationship, it is possible for exceptional notice of dismissal to be effective. That is why notice of dismissal should always be well prepared. Lawyers who are experienced in the field of employment law can advise employers on matters relating to dismissal as well as other legal issues.

https://www.grprainer.com/en/legal-advice/employment-law.html

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • GSK Update: AIFM Marketing in Germany - The clock is ticking for U.S. and other non-EU fund managers

    Our GSK Update informs about the impact of recent German investment fund legislation (UCITS V Implementation Act) for AIF managers, who are not domiciled in the EU (“non-EU-AIFM”) and who seek to market AIF shares in Germany in accordance with applicable German investment fund law under the EU-AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU).
  • GSK expands Luxembourg presence with a new tax partner

    Opened at the beginning of March 2016, GSK Stockmann + Kollegen continues to expand its Luxembourg office. Mathilde Ostertag recently joined the Luxembourg team of Equity Partners Dr. Marcus Peter, Andreas Heinzmann and Dr. Philipp Mößner as Local Tax Partner.
  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
  • New Top Level Domains – Noerr expert warns against trademark infringements

    On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".
    - Noerr
  • No obligation to set up filtering systems in order to prevent copyright violations

    ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
  • Further ECJ Ruling concerning NGO’s right of action under German environmental law

    For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
  • Lessons in Cross-Border M & A Transactions

    The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
  • Priority rental rights in insolvency

    Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.
  • Rome I Regulation: choice of law for contractual obligations

    The EU Rome I Regulation (593/2008) of the European Parliament and of the Council came into force on 17 December 2009 (Convention). The Convention sets rules to determine the (national) law applicable to contractual obligations in civil and commercial matters. This Regulation replaces the 1980 Rome Convention and is especially relevant to cross-border businesses. The intention of the Convention is to provide legal certainty in cases where the parties have not expressly chosen the applicable law governing their contract.
  • Restriction of the shareholder’s right to information

    According to a judgment of the German Federal Supreme Court from February 2010, the general assembly (Hauptversammlung) of a stock corporation (“Corporation”) may resolve to include a provision in its articles of association which comprehensively empowers the chairman to reasonably restrict the time available to shareholders to debate during the shareholder’s meeting.