The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

GRP Rainer LLP

AUGUSTINERSTRAßE 10, 50667 COLOGNE, GERMANY
Tel:
Work +49 221 272 2750
Fax:
Fax +49 221 2722 7524
Email:
Web:
www.grprainer.com
Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg and 3 more

Show all Press releases

GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte: Experience dealing with liability claims against GmbH managing directors

February 2017

The managing director of a GmbH, a type of German private limited company, is exposed to considerable liability risks. Legal advice ought to be urgently sought to minimize these risks as well as in the event of something happening that raises the issue of liability.

GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: One of the reasons businessmen frequently opt for the GmbH as their chosen corporate form is the comparatively low risk of liability associated with it. Notwithstanding this, GmbH managing directors are faced with significant personal liability risks. The law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte has a great deal of experience in the field of company law in addition to related legal fields, and can utilize its expires to minimize a GmbH managing director’s risk of liability.

GmbH managing directors can be faced with liability claims from two sides. On the one hand, they may be liable to the company itself (internal liability). On the other hand, third parties may bring claims against them (external liability).

A managing directors is essentially obligated to manage the company properly, i.e. he must exercise the care of a prudent businessman. If he violates his duties, this may give rise to liability claims against him brought by the company. Breach of duty entails culpability, whether this involves an intentional or standard violation of duty. Poor business decisions do not constitute a breach of duty.

The managing director’s duties also include ensuring that taxes and social security contributions are properly paid and timely filing for insolvency in the event that the company is faced with the imminent prospect of insolvency or over-indebtedness. If he breaches these duties, this may give rise to third-party liability claims.

It is possible to take various different preventative measures to minimize these private liability risks. Particular attention ought to be paid here to the way in which agreements are drafted. Moreover, it is advisable to take out a D&O insurance policy with sufficient coverage. The insurance policy should be tailored to the specific liability risks in question.

With its experience and high level of expertise, GRP Rechtsanwälte can advise on drafting agreements and concluding liability insurance for managers and thus exclude or at least minimize major liability risks. If, however, the worst does come to pass and claims are asserted against the managing director, it is also possible to assess whether the managing director violated one of his duties in the first place and ideally fend of the claims or reach an out-of-court settlement between the parties.

https://www.grprainer.com/en/legal-advice/company-law/managing-director.html

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • GSK Update: AIFM Marketing in Germany - The clock is ticking for U.S. and other non-EU fund managers

    Our GSK Update informs about the impact of recent German investment fund legislation (UCITS V Implementation Act) for AIF managers, who are not domiciled in the EU (“non-EU-AIFM”) and who seek to market AIF shares in Germany in accordance with applicable German investment fund law under the EU-AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU).
  • GSK expands Luxembourg presence with a new tax partner

    Opened at the beginning of March 2016, GSK Stockmann + Kollegen continues to expand its Luxembourg office. Mathilde Ostertag recently joined the Luxembourg team of Equity Partners Dr. Marcus Peter, Andreas Heinzmann and Dr. Philipp Mößner as Local Tax Partner.
  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
  • New Top Level Domains – Noerr expert warns against trademark infringements

    On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".
    - Noerr
  • No obligation to set up filtering systems in order to prevent copyright violations

    ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
  • Further ECJ Ruling concerning NGO’s right of action under German environmental law

    For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
  • Lessons in Cross-Border M & A Transactions

    The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
  • Priority rental rights in insolvency

    Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.
  • Rome I Regulation: choice of law for contractual obligations

    The EU Rome I Regulation (593/2008) of the European Parliament and of the Council came into force on 17 December 2009 (Convention). The Convention sets rules to determine the (national) law applicable to contractual obligations in civil and commercial matters. This Regulation replaces the 1980 Rome Convention and is especially relevant to cross-border businesses. The intention of the Convention is to provide legal certainty in cases where the parties have not expressly chosen the applicable law governing their contract.
  • Restriction of the shareholder’s right to information

    According to a judgment of the German Federal Supreme Court from February 2010, the general assembly (Hauptversammlung) of a stock corporation (“Corporation”) may resolve to include a provision in its articles of association which comprehensively empowers the chairman to reasonably restrict the time available to shareholders to debate during the shareholder’s meeting.