The Legal 500

VARUL

AHTRI 6A, 10151 TALLINN, ESTONIA
Tel:
Work +372 6 264 300
Fax:
Fax +372 6 264 306
Web:
www.varul.com
Email:
Vilnius, Tartu, Tallinn

Estonia : Banking and finance

Within Banking and finance, Varul is a second tier firm,

Varul advises on a range of banking and finance issues, and has a particular focus on disputes. The team recently represented Grove Invest in two interrelated disputes with SEB: firstly, SEB’s €5m claim against the client under a first demand guarantee agreement and, secondly, Grove Invest’s €95m damages counterclaim. Practice head Ants Mailend is well respected, and is supported by the talented Paul Varul and managing partner Helmut Pikmets.

Estonia : Corporate and M&A

Within Corporate and M&A, Varul is a first tier firm,

Varul advises numerous international and local clients on a wide range of matters pertaining to M&A, company formations, reorganisations, due diligence, and corporate governance. It recently advised Navirec, a cutting-edge vehicle tracking systems manufacturer, on selling its Estonian operation to GSMvalve. Ants Mailend and Martin Tamme jointly lead the practice and are highly recommended. Former senior associate Ramon Rask left to found his own firm.

Estonia : Dispute resolution

Within Dispute resolution, Varul is a first tier firm,

Varul successfully represented Euroapteek in a Supreme Court case against the State Agency of Medicines to define what constitutes a pharmacy advertisement, achieving a ruling that set precedent. Paul Varul has long been considered to be one of Estonia’s best litigators, and Helmut Pikmets is noted for his expertise in white-collar criminal cases.

Estonia : EU and competition

Within EU and competition, Varul is a first tier firm,

Varul recently represented Edelaraudtee AS, the largest diesel train operator in Estonia, in a competition dispute with the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. This case related to potentially unlawful state aid to be given to a competitor as well as the violation of public procurement rules by the Republic of Estonia. Experienced specialist Vaido Põldoja leads the team.

Estonia : IP, IT and telecoms

Within IP, IT and telecoms, Varul is a first tier firm,

Litigation specialist Varul has recently represented clients in trade mark litigation involving international clients, and also acted for Abobase Systems AS, a services and sales partner of Hewlett-Packard, in copyright litigation against the Republic of Estonia concerning the mobile telephone number mobility system. Practice head Ants Mailend is widely well respected.

Estonia : Real estate and construction

Within Real estate and construction, Varul is a first tier firm,

Varul successfully represented Viis Veeringut in a case against the Estonian Ministry of Culture concerning the minister’s directive that declared a commercial building in central Tallinn to be an architectural monument. The court found the directive to be contrary to aspects of the constitution and voided it. Department head Martin Tamme is recommended.

Estonia : Shipping and transport

Within Shipping and transport, Varul is a first tier firm,

Paricularly active in the rail sector, Varul is representing Edelaraudtee AS, Esonia’s largest diesel train operator, in negotiations with the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications to reduce the current contract for Edelaraudtee’s services in order to launch a 100% state-owned competitor.

Estonia : Tax

Within Tax, Varul is a first tier firm,

Varul successfully represented fuel retailer Kõrveküla Tankla before the Constitutional Review Chamber of the Supreme Court of Estonia in a dispute with the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. Vaido Põldoja leads the team, which also includes former department head and current managing partner Helmet Pikmets.


Legal Developments in Estonia

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Estonia allows claiming punitive damages

    On 31st December 2010 amendments to the Law Obligations Act (hereinafter LOA) came into force in Estonia, introducing the regulation allowing claiming punitive and preventive damages. Though the new regulation allows exemplary damages to be awarded only in the event of non-proprietary damages, it nevertheless constitutes a general paradigm shift, allowing for a much broader protection of personal rights.
  • Review of reorganisation proceedings in Estonia

    Until the adoption of Reorganisation Act Estonian legislation did not provide efficient regulation for companies which were in temporary financial difficulties, but could be “rescued” via certain turn-around proceedings to overcome the economically difficult period.  
  • New Estonian Advertising Act

    New Advertising Act has entered into force from 1st of November 2008. The main reason for drafting the new Act was the current situation in the advertising market – the legal regulation of the Advertising Act passed in 1997 needed to be modernized. Requirements for advertising goods and services, which are likely to cause controversy in the society, have been specified. Additional restrictions have been provided for advertising of alcohol products and financial services, while exemptions have been added to the advertising regulation of tobacco products and gambling. The efficiency of surveillance has been improved and additional measures have been taken. Consistency with the EU law is important in order to avoid discrimination of foreign manufacturers and service providers. Drafting a new act was expedient, whereas extensive amendments were to be made to the current legal regulation of advertising.
  • Division of the company as the joint property between the spouses

    The Civil Chamber of the Estonian Supreme Court has thoroughly handled the topics of division of joint property, repeated some earlier principles and given the clear instruction in the proceeding of division of the joint property of spouses in the question of assessment of the value of the company.
  • Estonian Supreme Court on the tax avoidance rules in share transfers

    The Estonian Supreme Court handled the taxation of the earnings of the physical persons through the application of the rule of economic interpretation (Taxation Act § 84) in its decision of 6 November 2008. In this case the Supreme Court gave the instructions which circumstances are important for establishing the existence of the objective of tax evasion. This is a significant decision in the cases of transfer of securities, where the tax authority has found that the substance and form of the transaction are not in compliance and in no doubt will have its impact to assessing the tax consequences of corporate restructurings.