The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

GSK Stockmann

Work +49 89 28 81 74 0
Fax +49 89 28 81 74 44
Berlin, Brussels, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Heidelberg, Luxembourg and 2 more

Show all Press releases

New Partner onboard: GSK Stockmann reinforces Industry-Compliance Group with Partner Hire from Pohlm

December 2017

GSK Stockmann reinforces its compliance group with a lateral hire from Pohlmann & Company and continues its push to focus on specific industry sectors and internationalization. Eric Mayer (51) will join GSK Stockmann on December 1, 2017 as a partner and will play a key role in growing the compliance group at GSK.

Eric Mayer (51) joins GSK Stockmann on December 1, 2017 from Pohlmann& Company. Before joining the advisory business at WTS AG in 2010, Mayer had gained more than 15 years of industry experience, for example at DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG, debitel AG, Infineon AG and the American chip producer Amkor Technology Inc. From 2006 to 2007 he was the first Chief Compliance Officer at Infineon AG in Munich. Mayer will join GSK as Local Partner (Salary Partner) in the Munich office and will be in charge of expanding GSK’s services in the area of industry compliance.

In recent years, the compliance group at GSK has been known especially due to its work in connection with the Independent Compliance Monitorship for the US Department of Justice at Siemens AG. From 2009 to 2012 a team consisting of app. 10 lawyers lead by Munich based partner Dr. Markus Escher assisted Dr. Theo Waigel, the Monitor appointment by the US Department of Justice. In addition, GSK has been worked in compliance projects for banks such as Sparkasse Miesbach-Tegernsee (Germany) and Raiffeisenlandesbank Oberösterreich (Austria). GSK lawyers also advised a former management board member in connection with the investigations by the public prosecutor´s office in Munich on Ferrostaal AG.

At present, a team lead by Dr. Markus Escher, Prof. Dr. Oliver Moufang and Oliver Koos (the last two from Frankfurt) is advising on international compliance issues in connection with the “Dieselgate” emissions affair at Volkswagen AG.

Currently, the GSK compliance team consists of app. 10 lawyers (among them four partners and two counsels) in Berlin, Frankfurt and Munich. In addition, GSK Compliance Services GmbH offers specific services e.g. on money laundering checks and on legal issues in connection with the outsourcing of the compliance- and/or money laundering controls function of regulated financial services companies.

“We are very happy about Eric Mayer joining GSK as he is a very experienced compliance advisor with a lot of industry experience, whose know-how and network will certainly give a significant boost to our compliance offerings which we have identified as a major growth area for GSK”, commented Dr. Oliver Glück, Co-Managing Partner at GSK Stockmann.

Eric Mayer described the reasons for joining GSK:

“With its orientation and focus on specific industry sectors (such as healthcare and automotive & mobility) GSK offers an ideal platform to advise medium-sized industry companies e.g. in the pharmaceutical or the automotive industry in an optimal way and to contribute to the further development of the consulting portfolio in the field of industry compliance at GSK. I envisage substantial synergies in the specific enhancement of effective compliance consulting products whose implementation is viable and which are more and more in demand not only by producing companies but also by real estate companies and by the public sector.”


Dr. Oliver GlĂĽck
Karl-Scharnagl-Ring 8
80539 MĂĽnchen
Tel.: +49 89 288174-0
Fax: +49 89 288174-44

Dr. Markus Escher
Karl-Scharnagl-Ring 8
80539 MĂĽnchen
Tel.: +49 89 288174-0
Fax: +49 89 288174-44

GSK Stockmann is one of the leading independent commercial law firms in Germany and Luxembourg focusing on Real Estate, Corporate, Banking/Finance and Projects & Public Sector. Today, more than 160 lawyers and tax advisors, acquainted with national and international projects and transactions, are at our clients´ disposal in our offices in Berlin, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Heidelberg, Munich and Luxembourg.

For cross-border transactions and international projects, GSK works closely with a select group of highly respected partner law firms abroad.

For further information please visit our website:

Legal Developments by:
GSK Stockmann

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • LAG DĂĽsseldorf: Dismissal with immediate effect valid in response to threat

    Anyone who seriously threatens their employer or superior should expect to be dismissed with immediate effect. This was confirmed by a ruling of the Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG) DĂĽsseldorf [Regional Labour Court of DĂĽsseldorf] from June 8, 2017 (Az.: 11 Sa 823/16).
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • GSK Update: AIFM Marketing in Germany - The clock is ticking for U.S. and other non-EU fund managers

    Our GSK Update informs about the impact of recent German investment fund legislation (UCITS V Implementation Act) for AIF managers, who are not domiciled in the EU (“non-EU-AIFM”) and who seek to market AIF shares in Germany in accordance with applicable German investment fund law under the EU-AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU).
  • GSK expands Luxembourg presence with a new tax partner

    Opened at the beginning of March 2016, GSK Stockmann + Kollegen continues to expand its Luxembourg office. Mathilde Ostertag recently joined the Luxembourg team of Equity Partners Dr. Marcus Peter, Andreas Heinzmann and Dr. Philipp Mößner as Local Tax Partner.
  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
  • New Top Level Domains – Noerr expert warns against trademark infringements

    On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".
    - Noerr
  • No obligation to set up filtering systems in order to prevent copyright violations

    ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
  • Further ECJ Ruling concerning NGO’s right of action under German environmental law

    For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
  • Lessons in Cross-Border M & A Transactions

    The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
  • Priority rental rights in insolvency

    Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.