The Legal 500

Hewitsons

SHAKESPEARE HOUSE, 42 NEWMARKET ROAD, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 8EP, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 01223 461155
Fax:
Fax 01223 316511
DX:
133155 CAMBRIDGE 8
Email:
Web:
www.hewitsons.com

Mark Elmslie

Tel:
Work 01223 461155
Email:
Hewitsons

Work Department

Technology group.

Position

Head of the firm’s contentious intellectual property group; specialises in all forms of intellectual property litigation, including patents, designs, trade marks, passing off and branding, copyright, confidential information actions, and domain name disputes; represents clients across a range of industries, including fashion, packaging, computer games, medical technology, novelty toys and products, agriculture, household and garden products, and retail. He also acts, or has acted for, a number of patent and trade mark attorneys in defending claims of professional negligence. He has represented clients in substantial intellectual property cases both here and in Australia, including multinational litigation involving dual proceedings in the UK and US; represented defendants in the ‘One in a Million’ domain name litigation.

Career

Trained Robyn Croydon, Adelaide; qualified 1982; various positions, Adelaide and London 1983-1990; assistant, Pettman Smith, London 1990-95; assistant, Wilde Sapte, London 1995-97; partner, Finers Stephens Innocent 1997-2000; special counsel, Minter Ellison, Melbourne 2001-02; partner, Hewitsons 2002 to date. Publications include: ‘Passing off and Image Marketing in the UK’ (with Margaret Lewis, EIPR vol 4 issue 8, 1992); ‘Summary judgment in UK Copyright Cases: LA Gear v Hi-Tech Sports’ (EIPR vol 14 issue 11); ‘Disclosure requirements in UK litigation – the Ziff case’ (EIPR vol 15 issue 9); ‘The New UK Trade Marks Bill’ (EIPR vol 16 issue 3); ‘The One in a Million case – Opinion’ (Entertainment Law Review vol 11, 1998); ‘Threats Actions in UK Trade Mark Cases’ (Managing Intellectual Property, September 1999); ‘“Clarity Lost” The Arsenal and Reed case’ (Trademark World, February 2003); author (with Simon Portman of Hewitsons) of ‘Intellectual Property: The Lifeblood of Your Company’ (Chandos Publishing I, 2006). Authors the chapter on Infringement in the Community Trade Marks Handbook published by Sweet & Maxwell. Regularly writes and speaks on all aspects of intellectual property law, particularly litigation.

Education

Kings College, Adelaide; University of Adelaide (1981 LLB); University of London (1994 LLM).

Leisure

Family, music, swimming, reading, golf, wine.


East Anglia : Dispute resolution

Commercial litigation: Cambridge

Within: Commercial litigation: Cambridge

Simon Biggin’s team at Hewitsons is ‘fantastic, accurate and insightful’. It advises VKR Holdings and Velux. Lucinda Brown (‘gives clients enormous confidence’), Robert McLellan, Mark Elmslie and Lorna Carter are all recommended.

[back to top]

East Anglia : TMT (Technology, Media and Telecoms)

Intellectual property

Within: Intellectual property

Hewitsons is ‘absolutely dependable and has a deep knowledge of IP matters’. The ‘calm, thoughtful, and first-rateMark Elmslie leads ‘the best IP litigation team in Cambridge’. Advice from Bill Thatcher, who advises Microsoft, is ‘well reasoned and carefully considered’.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars 2016

    Managaing Intellectual property has come up with its  IP Stars  2016  guide on Patents and Trademarks & Copyright and has recozined its senior practitioners under the following categories:
  • Anand and Anand recognized in Asia-Pacific Innovative Lawyers 2016 report

    Anand and Anand has been recognized amongst the FT25 Asia Pacific Headquartered law firms in the FT Asia-Pacific Innovative Lawyers 2016 Report. 
  • BASCAP 25 Best Practices

    ANAND AND ANAND convened a meeting with the ICC and BASCAP officials on 17th May 2016 for assessing the BASCAP 25 Best Practices vis-a-vis the level of copyright and trademark enforcement and protection in India. The discussion panel involved representatives from leading brands and Mr. Pravin Anand who suggested inputs to the proposed document. The document will be submitted to the Indian Government ahead of the BRICS Summit in October 2016.
  • LEASED LABOR IN KAZAKHSTAN: HAS THE NEW LABOR CODE LEGALIZED IT?

    Yuliya Chumachenko, Partner, AEQUITAS Law Firm
  • Austria: Shareholder Agreements - Back to Normal?

    On 1 January 2015 the act to amend regulations for partnerships, as defined under the Austrian Civil Code (GesbR-Reformgesetz – GesbR-RG, BGBl I 83/2014), entered into force. read more...
  • Czech Republic: New developments in contract registration

    The brand new Contract Register Act came into effect on 1 July 2016 (the Act). After 1 July 2016, contracts concluded with certain subjects, such as the state (the Czech Republic), state fund, etc., need to be published in the register of contracts (the "Register").If a contract is not published in the Register within three months of its conclusion, it is considered invalid from the outset (as if the contract was never concluded). read more...
  • What businessmen should know about legislative changes with major and interested transactions?

    It is well known that before making significant managerial decisions, the general director must obtain approval from the shareholders or the board of directors. Apart from that, if a director is personally interested in entering into a transaction, approval is also required to proceed with the transaction. In the absence of such an approval, the transaction can be challenged and, in certain circumstances, invalidated. In order to minimize such risks and to eliminate legal uncertainty for the parties to the transaction, the rules governing major transactions and interested transactions must be sufficiently clear. Previously, however, the application of these rules was associated with a large number of controversial legal issues, which were finally solved as a result of the legislative amendments, which will enter into force on January 1, 2017. According to the new amendments, the distinction between major and non-major transactions has been delineated more clearly, parties have been allowed more flexibility in relation to approving transactions, the burdensome obligation to obtain prior approval of interested transactions has been abrogated, and finally the procedure for challenging transactions in question has been made much more complex. Overall, the changes should have a positive influence on business, as they contribute to the establishment of firm legal certainty in this area of the law. 
  • Are you up to date on important Polish labour law matters?

    As an employer it is vital that you are informed on new labour law related issues that could negatively affect your organisation. In this legal insights we explore a number of these important legal points. read more...
  • A Maltese Solution for Swiss Asset Managers

    Until very recently the Swiss asset management industry relied exclusively on self-regulation and was allowed to operate and develop somewhat independently from European regulation. It is now confronted with major regulatory changes which will align Swiss laws and regulation with AIFMD and MIFID. Gone are the days where Swiss asset managers could be independent and unregulated. Swiss asset managers will now be subject to EU-like forms of authorisations and prudential supervision which will have a transformative impact on the Swiss asset management industry and bring additional costs, most notably compliance and operational costs, which will invariably adversely affect smaller independent asset managers.
  • INDIAN E-COMMERCE (B2C) MARKET CAN GROW FASTEST TO CROSS $100 BILLION BY 2020!

    BY: Sidharth Goyal & Anita Aswal