The Legal 500

Hewitsons

SHAKESPEARE HOUSE, 42 NEWMARKET ROAD, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 8EP, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 01223 461155
Fax:
Fax 01223 316511
DX:
133155 CAMBRIDGE 8
Email:
Web:
www.hewitsons.com

Mark Elmslie

Tel:
Work 01223 461155
Email:
Hewitsons

Work Department

Technology group.

Position

Head of the firm’s contentious intellectual property group; specialises in all forms of intellectual property litigation, including patents, designs, trade marks, passing off and branding, copyright, confidential information actions, and domain name disputes; represents clients across a range of industries, including fashion, packaging, computer games, medical technology, novelty toys and products, agriculture, household and garden products, and retail. He also acts, or has acted for, a number of patent and trade mark attorneys in defending claims of professional negligence. He has represented clients in substantial intellectual property cases both here and in Australia, including multinational litigation involving dual proceedings in the UK and US; represented defendants in the ‘One in a Million’ domain name litigation.

Career

Trained Robyn Croydon, Adelaide; qualified 1982; various positions, Adelaide and London 1983-1990; assistant, Pettman Smith, London 1990-95; assistant, Wilde Sapte, London 1995-97; partner, Finers Stephens Innocent 1997-2000; special counsel, Minter Ellison, Melbourne 2001-02; partner, Hewitsons 2002 to date. Publications include: ‘Passing off and Image Marketing in the UK’ (with Margaret Lewis, EIPR vol 4 issue 8, 1992); ‘Summary judgment in UK Copyright Cases: LA Gear v Hi-Tech Sports’ (EIPR vol 14 issue 11); ‘Disclosure requirements in UK litigation – the Ziff case’ (EIPR vol 15 issue 9); ‘The New UK Trade Marks Bill’ (EIPR vol 16 issue 3); ‘The One in a Million case – Opinion’ (Entertainment Law Review vol 11, 1998); ‘Threats Actions in UK Trade Mark Cases’ (Managing Intellectual Property, September 1999); ‘“Clarity Lost” The Arsenal and Reed case’ (Trademark World, February 2003); author (with Simon Portman of Hewitsons) of ‘Intellectual Property: The Lifeblood of Your Company’ (Chandos Publishing I, 2006). Authors the chapter on Infringement in the Community Trade Marks Handbook published by Sweet & Maxwell. Regularly writes and speaks on all aspects of intellectual property law, particularly litigation.

Education

Kings College, Adelaide; University of Adelaide (1981 LLB); University of London (1994 LLM).

Leisure

Family, music, swimming, reading, golf, wine.


East Anglia : TMT (technology, media and telecoms)

Intellectual property

Within: Intellectual property

Andrew Priest joined Hewitsons from Memery Crystal LLP to lead its technology department, and has in-depth knowledge of IP and know-how licensing deals. Bill Thatcher, who advises Microsoft, and litigator Mark Elmslie are also recommended.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Korea strengthens taxation on multi-national enterprises in 2017

    On July 28, 2016, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance (“MOSF”) announced the annual proposal to amend the tax law for 2017 (the “Proposal”). The Proposal was submitted to the National Assembly on 2 September 2016.
  • Protecting the ‘Little-Guy’ in Distributorship Arrangements in Korea

    - Enforcement Decree to the Fair Retail Agency Transactions Act
  • Single Continuous Infringement Concept and the Practice of the Turkish Competition Authority

    The concept of a single continuous infringement (" SCI ") enables competition authorities to consider a series of agreements or conducts that have the same objective to distort competition in the market as one single continuous infringement. Similar to the approach in the European Union, the Turkish Competition Authority ( Authority ) also considers this concept while assessing a case under Article 4 of Law No 4054 on the Protection of Competition of 13 December 1994 ( Law No 4054 ), which is akin to-if not the same as-Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( TFEU ).
  • Broader Interpretation Boosts Anti-Avoidance Rules

    Businesses seeking to structure cross-border transactions in ways that help them avoid paying tax are finding it more difficult as authorities worldwide step up information sharing. One such example is the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, which is driven by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and has 135 members. The cabinet recently approved Thailand's membership in the forum.
  • Austria: Amendments to Gas Market Model Ordinance

    The Gas Market Model Ordinance plays a major role in the Austrian gas market, as it regulates network access and the capacity management and balancing system in Austria's three market areas: the east, Tyrol and Vorarlberg. read more...
  • [South Korea] Data Privacy Legal Update

    Proposed Amendment to the Enforcement Decree of PIPA
  • Applications under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 - a practical update

    New Zealand’s overseas investment regime has been in the media spotlight in recent times. While lobbying organisations and political parties closely scrutinise the decisions of the Overseas Investment Office ( OIO ), those in the investment community have raised concerns that the regime is overly burdensome and time consuming. Against this background, there have been a number of changes in process and regulation, with further changes in the pipeline, aimed at ensuring the regime is fit for purpose. This article provides a brief overview of the regime and then looks at some of the recent and impending developments.  
  • Arbitrators’ Liability: Austrian Supreme Court Reconfirms Strict Standards

    One of the main advantages of arbitration vis-à-vis state court litigation, is that the parties are free to choose independent and highly specialised experts to decide their cases. Yet, if these experts negligently (or even deliberately) violate the duties that come with the acceptance of the appointment, the issue of liability arises. read more...
  • On Gifts, Courtesies and Other Business Amenities

    Nurlan Sholanov Partner, AEQUITAS Law Firm
  • Promissory Note Holders Not Bound by Arbitration Clause in Underlying Contract

    This update discusses the recent case of  Rals International Pte Ltd v Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza SpA  [2016] SGCA 53 where the Singapore Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court that the assignee’s claim based on a number of promissory notes did not fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement in the underlying Supply Agreement. The assignee of such notes was therefore free to litigate in the courts.