The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP

Living Wage
Work 020 7374 8000
Fax 020 7374 0888
Abu Dhabi, Bangkok, Beijing, Belfast, Berlin, Brisbane and 22 more

The firm: Operating from 26 offices across Asia Pacific, EMEA and the US, Herbert Smith Freehills is at the heart of the new global business landscape providing premium quality, full-service legal advice. The firm provides many of the world's most important organisations with access to market-leading dispute resolution, projects and transactional legal advice, combined with expertise in a number of global industry sectors, including banks, consumer products, energy, financial buyers, infrastructure and transport, mining, pharma and healthcare, real estate and TMT.

Types of work undertaken: Corporate and commercial: Herbert Smith Freehills' corporate practice provides clients with market-leading legal advice on their most important commercial transactions, including significant cross-border mergers and acquisitions, ground-breaking projects, complex capital markets fundraisings, financial regulation, inward investment, governance and risk management for companies' boards and corporate tax advice. Clients include the world's leading corporates, banks, financial buyers, governments and public sector bodies and the firm's role frequently puts it at the heart of industries that are reshaping, restructuring and expanding into the world's emerging markets. The diversity of the group allows it to advise on transactions across a wide range of industry sectors and it is acknowledged as providing world-class legal advice to energy and infrastructure, technology, media and telecoms, and financial services clients.

Banking and finance: the firm's growing finance practice is known for the distinctive quality of its debt finance capability, advising on international and domestic deals in the bank lending (including acquisition finance and property finance), securitisation and capital markets, asset finance and project finance markets, as well as on corporate recovery matters. Its experience of acting for parties on all sides of transactions and its reputation for innovation give the firm a broad and original perspective when approaching deals, particularly those that are complex. With a focus on service delivery, it has a full finance offering in London, Hong Kong, Frankfurt, Madrid, Moscow, Paris, Singapore and Australia.

Dispute resolution: the firm has a formidable reputation for domestic and international litigation, international arbitration and alternative dispute resolution ‚Äď a pre-eminent position it has held for decades. It is the breadth of the firm's practice and the experience and quality of its practitioners that distinguish it from its competitors.

Areas of specialism include: commercial litigation, international arbitration, advocacy, ADR, banking and regulatory disputes, intellectual property, cyber security, insurance litigation, private wealth and charities, international public law, competition litigation, fraud and investigations, health and safety, professional negligence and trusts litigation. Herbert Smith Freehills has a leading global advocacy practice. The firm's unique in-house advocacy unit provides a number of benefits for clients, including ease of instruction and reduction in cost.

Real estate: the firm has a reputation for executing the largest and most complex real estate deals with accuracy and at speed. Its broad practice covers finance, development, investment, infrastructure/projects, corporate occupier, planning, construction and property litigation.

Clients: the firm represents many of the world's leading corporations and investment banks. Its client base includes a growing number of the Middle East's and Asia's blue-chip multinationals.

In 2012 the firm expanded into America by opening an office in New York, which now comprises seasoned litigators, international arbitration specialists and projects and infrastructure practitioners. The firm expanded into Germany in 2013 with the opening of two offices (Frankfurt and Berlin) and opened a further office in South Korea (Seoul). 2015 saw the firm strengthening its presence across the EMEA region with its expansion into South Africa with an office in Johannesburg; Saudi Arabia with the launch of an exclusive association with the Law Office of Nasser Al-Hamdan in Riyadh; and Singapore with its Formal Law Alliance with Singapore law firm Prolegis LLC; the firm opened in D√ľsseldorf, its third office in Germany, in 2016. The firm opened its Kuala Lumpur office in May 2017, following the approval of its Qualified Foreign Law Firm licence by Bar Council Malaysia.

Other offices: Bangkok, Beijing, Belfast, Berlin, Brisbane, Brussels, Dubai, D√ľsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Jakarta (associated firm), Johannesburg, Kuala Lumpur, Madrid, Melbourne, Moscow, New York, Paris, Perth, Saudi Arabia (associated firm), Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore (associated firm), Sydney, Tokyo.

  • UK: 
  • Number of partners: 161
  • Number of other fee-earners: 465
  • Global: 
  • Number of partners: 469
  • Number of other fee-earners: 2,478

Above material supplied by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.