The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
VECTOR BUSINESS CENTRE, 10G STAROKYIVSKA STR, 04655 KIEV, UKRAINE
Tel:
Work +380 44 234 3619
Fax:
Fax +380 44 234 3619
Email:
Web:
www.kpdconsulting.com.ua

Vitaliy Patsyuk

Tel:
Work +380675751173
Email:
KPD Consulting Law Firm

Work Department

Corporate and M&A;

Tax

Position

Partner, Head of Corporate and M&A Practice and Tax Practice

Career

October 2007 – present – partner at KPD Consulting Law Firm (http://www.kpdconsulting.com.ua), Head of Corporate and M&A Practice and Tax Practice, attorney-at-law;

November 2003 – September 2007 – in-house in UkrsibBankGroup, head of legal examination and analytics department;

August 2003 – November 2003 Ukrsotsbank Joint-Stock Bank (“toxic” debts recovering department), senior legal adviser;

August 2002 – June 2003 Turboatom Open Joint-Stock Company (legal department), legal adviser

Languages

Ukrainian, English, Russian

Member

Kyiv City Bar Association

Education

Yaroslav Mudry National Law Academy of Ukraine, Kharkiv (1997 – 2002, Law Degree with honours)

Economic School at the Kharkiv National University (2002 – 2004, Banking Degree with honours)


Ukraine

Commercial, corporate and M&A

Within: Commercial, corporate and M&A

KPD Consulting Law Firm has ‘a professional attitude’ and provides ‘a tailored service at a reasonable cost’. Vitaliy Patsyuk advised DCH on the structuring of 12 legal entities, and assisted developer Ukrsib-Invest with joint venture agreements totalling $61m.

[back to top]

Tax

Within: Tax

Highly motivated’ practice head Vitaliy Patsyuk at KPD Consulting Law Firm has ‘excellent knowledge and a creative mind’. Ukrsibinvest is a key client.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments in Ukraine

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • New Law on LLCs in Ukraine

    The Law of Ukraine On the Limited Liability Companies and Additional Liability Companies passed on 6 February 2018 shall come into force on 17 June 2018. The Law is a positive sign for doing business in Ukraine as it introduces significant changes and innovations in the legal regulation of the establishment and activities of limited liability companies, which are the most numerous and the most popular form of entrepreneurial activity in Ukraine (second only to individual entrepreneurs).
  • The Code of bankruptcy procedure in Ukraine: positives and negatives of the new document

    The Verkhovna Rada registered a draft law on the Code of Bankruptcy Procedure (No. 8060). Among other things, it is noted that such a document will increase the efficiency of bankruptcy procedures, the level of protection of the rights of creditors, improve the procedures for selling debtor property at the auction, increase the level of execution of contracts and court decisions. However, does the text of the document correspond to the stated purpose? 
    - GOLAW
  • CHANGES TO PPA: TO MAKE FINANCIAERS HAPPY

    Over the last few months before January 2018, when the latest changes to the power purchase agreements (PPAs) between State Enterprise “Energorynok” and producers of energy from alternative sources were adopted, more than ten agreements were signed with upgraded conditions set earlier in 2017. In the mentioned agreements, the changes to the PPAs were applied and helped bring Ukraine’s PPAs closer to international standards. Nevertheless, the revised PPAs still have a lot of issues that need to be clarified and further elaborated to make them perfectly bankable, and to make them properly executable.
    - GOLAW
  • Antitrust Compliance Program in Ukraine: Current Status and Development Prospect

    Mykola Stetsenko, Managing Partner, AVELLUM
  • Recent Legal Developments in Renewable Energy Sector

    Glib Bondar, Partner, AVELLUM
  • A Remarkable Year of Restructuring. What Next?

    What happened in 2015 in the world of Ukrainian corporate finance was a reflection of larger scale events in and around Ukraine. In this article, we will share our view of the key events in 2015 in the area of cor-porate finance, highlight the most important legislative and regulatory developments in finance and, based on our experience, make a few suggestions for creditors and debtors on how to navigate through 2016.
  • Enforcement in Ukraine of Interim Orders Issued by Foreign Courts and Arbitral Tribunals

    In the past few years Ukrainian clients have developed an appetite for solving their disputes abroad. Litigation and arbitration sagas involving Ukrainian parties or related to Ukrainian assets often spread across many jurisdictions. In many such sagas various interim reliefs were granted by courts and tribunals.
  • Applicable law in contractual disputes: recent arbitration practice

    AstapovLawyers Partner Eugene Blinov & the firm's Associate Roman Protsyshyn share their recent arbitration practice regarding applicable law in contractual disputes.
  • Disputes arising from finance arrangements: post-crisis phenomenon in Ukraine – read more!

    The 2008 financial crisis peak had hardly faded away, when another breaking news was brought to the surface in CIS countries: a significant part of the funds advanced during the pre-crisis period by banks and other financial institutions to support various businesses and commercial initiatives, flew beyond national frontiers to be found in Panama, BVI, Seychelles, Jersey, Cyprus and other offshore and onshore jurisdictions in the pockets of numerous private persons, mostly CIS nationals. No surprise this fact led to a tsunami of disputes, one way or the other related to repayment of loans and funds advanced under other types of finance arrangements. Many of those disputes are still pending, thus, keeping finance arrangements among the top-litigated issues within CIS borders.
  • Proper notices in arbitration – watch the details!

    Article V1(b) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, better known as the New York Convention, provides that recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award may be refused, at the request of the party against which it is invoked, only if that party furnishes proof to the competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought that it was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings. However simple at first glance, the question of what constitutes 'proper notice' turns out to be less than clear in practice.