The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Greenwoods GRM

Work 020 7242 6301
Fax 020 7242 6652

London: Corporate and commercial

Equity capital markets ‚Äď small-mid cap
Leading individuals

Dov Katz - Greenwoods GRM

[back to top]

London: Dispute resolution

Commercial litigation
Commercial litigation - ranked: tier 8

Greenwoods GRM

Greenwoods GRM 'has a fantastic range of clients and a growing team that is dynamic and ambitious'. The team advises on disputes involving financial services, insolvency, education, manufacturing, natural resources, and oil and gas. Huw Wallis, who splits his time between Peterborough and London, is disputes head; Nicholas Scott is also highly regarded.

Practice head(s):Huw Wallis

Other key lawyers:Nicholas Scott


'Provides a personal approach to clients'.

Key Clients

Brewin Dolphin

MAHLE Industries

[back to top]

London: Private client

Family - ranked: tier 6

Greenwoods GRM

Greenwoods GRM advises on a broad range of matters from private law proceedings under the Children Act 1989 to complex domestic violence and welfare matters. Under the leadership of Simon Donald the team is also adept at advising unmarried parents on issues surrounding the financial provision for their children as well as pre- and post-nuptial agreements.

Practice head(s):Simon Donald

Other key lawyers:Lesley Pendlebury Cox


'The family team is a small, specialist one and deals with complicated matrimonial finance work. Quite a chunk of its work has an international element to it. Simon Donald is a tremendous lawyer – he knows the answer to the tricky questions and is great tactically'.

'Simon Donald has a no nonsense approach and is someone who gets to the root of the case quickly and is always in a position to provide advice on an early resolution'.

'Lesley Pendlebury Cox is an outstanding solicitor and has always been on hand at any time of day and day of week to support me'.

'Lesley Pendlebury Cox is one of the most conscientious and diligent solicitors I have come across. She cares passionately about her cases and is strikingly empathetic to her clients'.

'Lesley Pendlebury Cox is absolutely dedicated to getting the right result for the client. Not just legally but also holistically'.

Work highlights

  • Advised on private law proceedings under the Children Act 1989.
  • Advised on allegations of child abduction that were raised by the applicant father/allegations of domestic violence raised by the respondent mother (Private Law Children Act 1989 proceedings).
  • Advised on a variation of a consent order made in financial remedies proceedings under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.
  • Advising on divorce proceedings where there are trust structures and business assets.
  • Advising on divorce and financial proceedings where there are allegations of financial misconduct.

[back to top]

Personal tax, trusts and probate
Personal tax, trusts and probate - ranked: tier 5

Greenwoods GRM

Ian Bowyer heads the team at Greenwoods GRM in London. Bowyer has extensive knowledge of onshore trusts and probate work. He routinely deals with high-value estates where there is heritage property. Senior associate Muna Rogoff advises clients on mental health-related issues such as lasting powers of attorney and deputyships.

Practice head(s):Ian Bowyer

Other key lawyers:Muna Rogoff; Philip Carter


'The quality of personal attention has been deeply appreciated.'

'Muna Rogoff is very approachable and very good at making suggestions as well as giving practical advice on a personal level. She makes time for her clients and responds promptly. Philip Cater, Ian Bowyer and Muna's knowledge of their practice area is second to none.'

'Philip Carter, unlike other solicitors I have used, is always on top of all the detail, never drops the ball and never lets the work linger on his desk.'

'Philip Carter, in a challenging client situation, has always been thorough and efficient as well as handling the client situation with empathy and sensitivity.'

[back to top]

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.