The Legal 500

17/52A BOGDANA KHMELNITSKOGO STREET, 01030 KIEV, UKRAINE
Tel:
Work +380 44 581 7777
Fax:
Fax +380 44 581 7770
Web:
www.kisilandpartners.com
Email:

Oleg Makarov

Tel:
Work +38 (044) 581 77 77
Email:
Vasil Kisil & Partners

Work Department

Litigation; Tax.

Position

Oleg A. Makarov has been a partner with Vasil Kisil & Partners since the establishment of the firm. Since 2007 to present he is the Managing Partner of the firm.

Career

For over twenty years, Mr. Makarov has been practicing Domestic and International Litigation, Taxation, Investments, Securities, Property Law and Bankruptcy Law. His litigation practice is one of the most extensive among Ukrainian lawyers. Oleg A. Makarov has been repeatedly reported as one of the best litigation practitioners by numerous national and foreign publications: Chambers Europe, Legal 500, The PLC Cross-border Dispute Resolution Handbook, Who’s Who Legal CIS, Ukrainian Law Firms (a Handbook for Foreign Clients), Clients' Choice Rating (Yuridicheskaya Gazeta), Top 100 Lawyers in Ukraine etc. Oleg Makarov is the author of numerous commentaries and legal reviews on the issues of dispute resolution, Ukrainian judicial system, the legal profession, status and position of the attorneys in Ukraine. He also has been actively involved in preparation of a number of draft laws submitted to Ukrainian Parliament.

Languages

Ukrainian, Russian, English, German.

Member

Oleg A. Makarov is a member of the Board at The Ukrainian Bar Association, a Vice-Chairman of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Kyiv City Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar; he is also a member of Public Council of the State Court Administration of Ukraine and The Ministry of Justice.

Education

National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, The Institute of International Relations, The International Law Department,1989.

Back to index

Legal Developments in Ukraine

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Disputes arising from finance arrangements: post-crisis phenomenon in Ukraine – read more!

    The 2008 financial crisis peak had hardly faded away, when another breaking news was brought to the surface in CIS countries: a significant part of the funds advanced during the pre-crisis period by banks and other financial institutions to support various businesses and commercial initiatives, flew beyond national frontiers to be found in Panama, BVI, Seychelles, Jersey, Cyprus and other offshore and onshore jurisdictions in the pockets of numerous private persons, mostly CIS nationals. No surprise this fact led to a tsunami of disputes, one way or the other related to repayment of loans and funds advanced under other types of finance arrangements. Many of those disputes are still pending, thus, keeping finance arrangements among the top-litigated issues within CIS borders.
  • Proper notices in arbitration – watch the details!

    Article V1(b) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, better known as the New York Convention, provides that recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award may be refused, at the request of the party against which it is invoked, only if that party furnishes proof to the competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought that it was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings. However simple at first glance, the question of what constitutes 'proper notice' turns out to be less than clear in practice.
  • The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Real Estate 2013. Chapter 38: Ukraine

    This guide provides the international practitioner and in-house counsel with a comprehensive worldwide legal analysis of the laws and regulations of real estate. This article appeared in the 2013 edition of The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Real Estate; published by Global Legal Group Ltd, London. www.iclg.co.uk )
  • Is the Door to England Still That Wide Open for CIS Disputes?

    6 February has marked lawyers’ calendars with an important message from the UK Supreme Court: English courts will not accept the jurisdiction over a dispute having the “centre of gravity” in another country. AstapovLawyers' Managing Partner Andrey Astapov and Associate Anna Kombikova comment on a recent CIS precedent.
  • Time limit for forwarding arbitral award to parties extended

    The Presidium of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UCCI) recently amended Article 52 of the Rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the UCCI. This article governs the procedure for forwarding an arbitral award to the parties to arbitration proceedings.
  • Enforcing arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies

    Eugene Blinov and Anna Kombikova of AstapovLawyers ILG commented on peculiarities of enforcement of arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies. The lawyers noted the risks connected with such cases and suggested possible solutions.
  • Ukraine: National Bank incredibly fast in implementing its new power

    On 6 November 2012, the Ukrainian Parliament adopted changes to the Law of Ukraine "On the Procedure of Carrying-Out Settlements in Foreign Currency", dated 23 September 2004, No. 185/94-BP, as amended, granting the National Bank of Ukraine ("NBU") a power to amend for a term of up to six months the term for cre-diting to the exporters' accounts of currency proceeds under export contracts. These changes to the law entered into force on 17 November 2012. The NBU was extremely fast to implement its new power, passing a Resolution dated 16 November 2012, No. 475 (which entered into force on 19 November 2012).
  • Mitigation of damages in arbitration practice: trite law or space for creativity?

    The mitigation of damages is a well-known principle in international legal practice. However, in Ukraine there is no widely applied court and arbitration practice on the issues relating to mitigation of damages, and aggrieved parties may be unclear as to what should and can be done.
  • Ukraine enables itself to furnish procedural orders of foreign judicial and arbitral authorities

    The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine at its meeting on August 29 resolved [1] to amend its Resolution "On approval of the Order for the use of funds allocated in the state budget for payments related to implementation of judgments of foreign jurisdictional authorities rendered upon consideration of matters against Ukraine" (the "Government Resolution").[2] Appropriate amendments were prepared by the Ministry of Justice (responsible for protecting the state's interests in foreign courts and arbitral tribunals) in order to improve mechanisms to protect the rights and interests of Ukraine in foreign judicial and arbitral proceedings.
  • Ukrainian district court allowed attachment of property located in Ukraine on the basis of UK proced

    On 1 June 2012 Goloseevskiy district court of Kyiv city rendered a decision whereby it recognized and enforced the Order of the High Court of Justice Queen Bench Division Commercial Court (Order). As a result, Ukrainian court allowed attachment of Debtor’s assets located in Ukraine.