The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

bnt | attorneys-at-law

Work +370 52 1 21627
Fax +370 5 212 1630
Bratislava, Budapest, Kiev, Minsk, Nuremberg, Prague and 4 more


Commercial, corporate and M&A
Commercial, corporate and M&A - ranked: tier 3

bnt attorneys-at-law

bnt attorneys-at-law is a ‘dependable and competent business partner’. Department head Frank Heemann advised Bretalita on a corporate and financial restructuring. Yvonne Goldammer is highly recommended. Senior associate Rasa Grambaitė-Pusčienė joined from Ellex (Lithuania).

[back to top]

Dispute resolution
Dispute resolution - ranked: tier 3

bnt attorneys-at-law

Mindaugas Navickas and Frank Heemann head the ‘very well-connected’ practice at bnt attorneys-at-law; they represented N.W. Baltic Supply Import-Export in a claims recovery dispute with Lietuvos Jūrų Laivininkystė. Senior associate Rasa Grambaitė-Pusčienė joined from Ellex (Lithuania).

[back to top]

EU and competition
Other recommended firms - ranked: tier 1

bnt attorneys-at-law

[back to top]

Shipping and transport
Shipping and transport - ranked: tier 2

bnt attorneys-at-law

bnt attorneys-at-law provides a ‘very good service’ to clients including Wizz Air and Stena Line. The group defended EPG Eisenbahn- und Bauplanungs-Gesellschaft’s Lithuanian branch in a dispute with Lithuanian Railways regarding alleged defects in railway engineering. Frank Heemann and Mindaugas Navickas are key figures. Senior associate Rasa Grambaitė-Pusčienė joined from Ellex (Lithuania).

[back to top]

Further information on bnt | attorneys-at-law

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about bnt | attorneys-at-law in other jurisdictions.


Offices in Minsk

Czech Republic

Offices in Prague


Offices in Vilnius


Offices in Riga


Offices in Warsaw


Offices in Bratislava

Legal Developments by:
bnt | attorneys-at-law

  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
    - bnt attorneys-at-law

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to