NSN Law Firm > Istanbul, Turkey > Firm Profile

NSN Law Firm > Firm Profile

The firm: NSN Law Firm was set up in 2000 by senior partners Nedret Ünlü, Sevilay Kuru and Nazlı Selek, who were mainly active in commercial, maritime and transportation litigation. In 2010, senior partner Selma Ünlü (responsible for IP and life sciences) joined the firm with her team. Since then, NSN Law Firm has become one of the largest law firms in Turkey, consisting of fourteen partners, a counsel and 38 associates.

NSN Law Firm is a well-established eminent full service law firm offering a comprehensive range of services to our clients of utmost quality, with the core strength being commercial, corporate, intellectual and industrial property, life sciences, advertising, media and entertainment, regulatory, maritime, insurance, transport, IT, telecommunications and technology law.

Located in Istanbul, NSN is also in cooperation with associate offices in İzmir, Antalya and Ankara allowing us to provide legal services throughout Turkey. Additionally, our firm enjoys long-standing relationships with law offices worldwide, enabling us to assist our clients in handling international disputes in different jurisdictions.

We always act in accordance with our core values for providing our services competently, efficiently and creatively with an international business-mind. These values are the foundation and the driving force of our success. We take pride in always aiming for the highest standards to ensure a consistently excellent service for our clients.

NSN Law Firm also conducts pro bono work. Our firm established NSN Academy which provides training to law students or junior lawyers in the area of IP law. We also have a collaboration with Beykent University Law Faculty where we regularly provide training lessons for students with respect to practice of IP Law.

Areas of practice
Transportation, maritime and admiralty: NSN Law Firm is one of the leading firms in handling all kinds of transportation issues, whether domestic or international in scope. The firm has experience resolving major causality claims, cargo claims, salvage and towage disputes, as well as yachting, shipbuilding and personal injury claims.

Commercial and corporate: We provide our clients with comprehensive legal advice and support on daily corporate secretarial work, company establishment procedures, share transfers, asset transfers, mergers and acquisitions, and sale and purchase transactions. NSN Law Firm is able to provide legal services diversifying from counseling clients on highly regulated sectors to dispute resolution. The team also has special expertise in counseling clients in covering commercial and corporate law formalities, drafting complex corporate agreements, preparation of corporate documents and representing them before administrative and judicial authorities.

Intellectual property: NSN Law Firm is a leading IP firm in Turkey, covering trademark, copyright and patent protection. The firm provides an all-in-one IP service, from investigation and registration to litigation and enforcement. One of the main distinctions among other IP firms is that our firm does not only provide legal services limited to trademark law; our firm is actively counselling in all areas of IP as well as other IP related law matters. Our firm’s IP department consists of three practice groups namely; copyright practice group; trademark and design practice group; and patent and life sciences practice group. We are also assisting clients in regulatory matters in which we have extensive experience.

Advertisement, media and entertainment: The firm provides services for advertising agencies, national telecommunication network operators, television and radio broadcasters, social network operators, online retailers, film and television producers, consumer electronics manufacturers, computer games companies and intermediary firms. NSN Law Firm represents clients holding 40% of the ticketing and box office incomes from entertainment and media business in Turkey, and houses a strong copyright enforcement team. We also represent our clients in resolving their disputes either with private sector parties or with respect to the decision taken by governmental authorities.

Life sciences: NSN Law Firm advises a number of multinational life sciences companies and prestigious associations on a wide range of matters, including licensing agreements, pricing, regulations, reimbursement regulations, marketing authorization procedures, clinical trial and observational study projects, and promotion practices. With our qualified life sciences practice group, we are following the sector very closely so that we are capable of providing a comprehensive strategy in considering legal aspects of the matter as well for our clients.

Information technologies: NSN Law Firm gives legal support to its clients in domain name disputes, data protection, online gaming and gambling, computer software, social networks and online retailers, the team has a wide range of experience in IT Law including drafting software contracts, corporate legal policies and standard operating policies for IT companies.

Employment and labor: Our firm works closely with the human resources departments of our clients and delivers clear, practical and results-oriented legal advice on all aspects of employment and labor law including, but not limited to, the legal compliance issues, contract drafting, preparation and implementation of workplace regulations, management and follow-up of work permit processes for the foreign personnel, organization and restructuring of employment standards for eliminating deficiencies and avoiding misconduct during employment practices.

Dispute resolution: NSN Law Firm’s strong litigation team works across all practice areas, and its expertise is accredited by both national and international clients. The firm is actively involved in litigation, arbitration and mediation on shipping, transport and aviation corporate and commercial, employment and labor issues, as well as the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards and IP litigation.

Interviews

Press Releases

PHARMA & BIOTECH PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE

12th May 2023 Our senior partner Selma Unlu participated in the virtual conference PHARMA & BIOTECH PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE as a speaker.

Our partner Bilge Derinbay has participated in the virtual conference #TPN2022 as a speaker on March 9-10

12th May 2023 Our partner Bilge Derinbay was delighted to speak at the virtual conference #TPN2022 on March 9-10, 2022!

The Regulation on Digital Banking and Banking as a Service (BaaS) is Published

12th May 2023 The Regulation on Operating Principles of Digital Banks and Banking as a Service (“Regulation”) was published in the Official Gazette dated 29.12.2021 numbered 31704 and became effective as of 01.01.2022.

How do NFTs work under Turkish Copyright Law? 17.05.2022

12th May 2023 As we addressed in a previous article, Non-Fungible Tokens (“NFTs”) are unique assets that have emerged following the rapid development of digitalization and they have attracted the world’s attention,

Termination of the Employment by Getting WhatsApp Correspondence is a Violation of Private Life

12th May 2023 With the decision (“Decision”) published by the Turkish Constitutional Court on 11.02.2022, it was ruled that the employer's termination of the employee's employment contract on the grounds of WhatsApp correspondence has violated the employee's "Right to Freedom of Communication” and “Respect for Private Life".

Legislative Proposal for Social Media Complaints and Cyber Crimes

12th May 2023 The legislative proposal dated February 02, 2022 which envisages amendments to the Turkish Penal Code (“TPC”) and the Code No. 5651 on Regulation of Broadcasts via Internet and Prevention of Crimes Committed through Such Broadcast was published on the website of the Turkish Grand National Assembly (“TBMM”).

The Decision of the Constitutional Court on Shift Tracking with Fingerprint Recording System

12th May 2023 With the decision (“Decision”) dated 10.03.2022 and application numbered 2018/11988, published in the Official Gazette dated 19.04.2022 and numbered 31814, in the case of the employee is tracked by using the fingerprint recording system, the Turkish Constitutional Court has evaluated whether the use of fingerprint complies with legal regulations and has reached a conclusion that the right to request the protection of personal data within the scope of respect for private life, which is guaranteed in Article 20 of the Turkish Constitution, has been violated.

The Decision of the Constitutional Court on Overtime Pay and the Right to Property

12th May 2023 With the Decision (“Decision”) dated 22.02.2022 and application numbered 2019/1450, published in the Official Gazette dated 05.04.2022 and numbered 31800, in the case of non-payment of overtime pay of an employee, the Turkish Constitutional Court has reached a conclusion according to whether the overtime has been worked in accordance with the legal regulations, that the right to property has been violated.

New Era // Digital Markets Act:

12th May 2023

What is it and what will happen for Big Tech?

The draft of a new Digital Markets Act has been proposed to European Parliament and Council on 15.12.2020. Although it is not yet published in the Official Journal of European Parliament, Parliament and Council negotiators agreed new EU rules to limit the market power of big online platforms on 24.03.2022 after a session that has lasted 8 hours. After the legal text is finalized at technical level and checked by lawyer-linguists, it will need to be approved by both Parliament and Council. Once this process is completed, it will come into force 20 days after its publication in the EU Official Journal and the rules will apply six months after. However, it is already understood that we are facing new legislation that will directly affect the activities of the BTO’s in the IT sector. It seems that the platforms defined as “Gatekeepers” will require a special and intense piece of legal counselling in order to properly understand the scope of the DMA and fully comply with it. Therefore, it will be both hard to be understood by the reader and will probably remain a futile effort to attempt to analyses such a complex issue comprehensively in a single article. Instead, we will try to summarize the very essence of the DMA by explaining the concerns with which the European Parliament carries out such legislation, and we will try to explain some of the changes that will be experienced in the lives of corporate or end-users by this law.

What Does European Parliament Try to Accomplish with the DMA?

In the introductory section of the draft submitted to the European Parliament titled "Explanatory Memorandum", the substantial development of online platforms in recent years has been explained. According to the statistics of 2019, Digital Economy’s share in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in European Countries is estimated at 4.5% to 15,5% with a growing trend. In this huge economy, one of the key roles is played in where the corporate user and the end consumer meet, “the Gates”, as the DMA puts it, and the platforms (Facebook, Youtube, Instagram, etc.) that hold those gates. The European Parliament defined the platforms that meet certain conditions in terms of the number of users and economic capacity as "Gatekeepers" and prepared the proposal in discussion with the intention to limit their activities to the point that does not harm the parties of the commercial relationship that takes place on those gates. As a matter of fact, the parliament openly expresses its opinion in the memo that these powerful platforms make corporate users dependent on them and sometimes expose them to malicious actions through their solid position and huge influence in digital markets. Furthermore, it is also mentioned that these unfair practices and lack of competition have consequences to the detriment of European population by ultimately reducing service quality, raising prices and reducing options. That's why the Parliament tries to prevent the unfair activities of the Gatekeepers by imposing certain obligations and sanctions in addition to the unfair competition practices in effect.

Who is Called a “Gatekeeper”?

The DMA specifies the fields in which the platforms, which will be discussed whether to be defined as Gatekeeper or not within the scope of the law, should operate. According to the European Parliament, platforms that provide (i) online intermediation services (incl. for example marketplaces, app stores and online intermediation services in other sectors like mobility, transport or energy) (ii) online search engines, (iii) social networking (iv) video-sharing platform services, (v) number independent interpersonal electronic communication services, (vi) operating systems, (vii) cloud services and (viii) advertising services, including advertising networks, advertising exchanges and any other advertising intermediation services, where these advertising services are being related to one or more of the other core platform services can be defined as Gatekeeper. According to DMA, a platform operating in these areas must also meet many other conditions in various categories in order to be defined as "Gatekeeper". In the definition of a Gatekeeper made by the DMA, three elements are sorted: (1) it must have a significant influence in the domestic market (influence factor), (2) it must operates a core platform service which serves as an important gateway for business users to reach end-users (gateway factor), and (3) it must enjoy an entrenched and durable position in its operations or it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position in the near future (permanence factor). So, how will it be understood whether these elements are provided or not? According to the European Parliament, for a platform to qualify as a Gatekeeper, it must operate in at least three member states, have an annual turnover of 6.5 million Euros in the last three years, or have a total market value of 65 billion Euros. In addition to these financial conditions, it is determined that the platform will be called "Gatekeeper" if the platform reaches 45 million monthly active end consumers or more than 10 thousand corporate users operating in the European Union in the last financial year. The European Parliament requires platforms that meet the conditions mentioned above to notify the European Parliament of their situation within 3 months. Even if the platforms do not notify the commission despite meeting the relevant conditions, they still can be classified as a "Gatekeeper" by the commission after through an ex officio investigation. In any case, it will be periodically examined in every 2 years whether the platform still meets the conditions after once they are defined as Gatekeepers.

Some Obligations Introduced to Protect End and Corporate Users from Gatekeepers:

Certain obligations brought to Gatekeepers are regulated in the 5th and 6th Articles of the DMA. For those Gatekeepers who do not comply and fulfill related obligations, The European Parliament has also imposed a number of sanctions, such as penalty fines up to 10% of its annual turnover. As an example to it; Gatekeeper shall refrain from combining personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services, and from signing in end-users to other services of the gatekeeper in order to combine personal data. For example, an holding that owns different social media platforms cannot transfer information about the user's shopping interests between these channels in order to bring a related advertisement or promotion on the other platform as well. In another paragraph of the article, it is also banned that corporate or end-users cannot be forced to sign in or log in to another platform in order to benefit from a core platform service. Another remarkable regulation is that the gatekeeper shall allow business users to promote offers to end-users acquired via the core platform service, and to conclude contracts with these end-users regardless of whether for that purpose they use the core platform services of the gatekeeper or not, and allow end-users to access and use, through the core platform services of the gatekeeper, content, subscriptions, features or other items by using the software application of a business user, where these items have been acquired by the end-users from the relevant business user without using the core platform services of the gatekeeper. Platforms described as Gatekeeper have been imposed a number of obligations other than those listed above. E.g; Gatekeepers cannot prevent or restrict business users from raising issues with any relevant public authority relating to any practice of gatekeepers or, a gatekeeper cannot use the confidential information of the end-user obtained via activities of the business user in order to compete with the business user on his own behalf or, the corporate or end-user's switching to another software while using any software cannot be prevented by technical measures.

Conclusion:

As in every period of history, technological developments make it much easier to carry out economic activities today. Currently, delivering a good or service to the final consumer requires much fewer logistics, technical and economic resources than previous. Therefore, the market becomes more competitive, the costs decrease and attempts to disrupt natural consumer behavior and choices are more challenging to implement. Goods or service providers are quickly rewarded or punished by consumers in accordance with the quality or price of the service they provide or their approach to the consumer. Therefore, a fairer trade is made possible as a result. Concordantly to the developing opportunities, new unfair practices that the usual scope of protection of competition law has difficulty in responding to is also flourishing and developing. In this respect, the European Parliament has taken a significant step in the field of law to protect the European community from these new unfair practices. We will keep following the developments excitedly on whether this step will be embraced by the member states or the big-time operators, similar legislations will come into power in our country, and mostly, how the law will keep marching with the time.

---

To see our other articles, you may follow the NSN Bulletin via the link.

---

Authors: Bilge Derinbay, Hande Ülker Pehlivan, Metin Sezgin Contact: bilge.derinbay@nsn-law.com

Psychological Tests Applied During Recruitment

12th May 2023 In the recruitment processes, the use of tests to determine whether employee candidates have the abilities, skills and some behaviors due to the nature of the job has become common in recent years.

The First Permit for the Incorporation of a Digital Participation Bank

12th May 2023 The Banking Regulation and Supervision Board (“BDDK”) Decision numbered 10165 and dated 21.04.2022 on permitting the incorporation of a digital participation bank was published in the Official Gazette dated 22.04.2022 and numbered 31817.

The Decision of the Constitutional Court on Shift Tracking with Fingerprint Recording System

12th May 2023 With the decision (“Decision”) dated 10.03.2022 and application numbered 2018/11988, published in the Official Gazette dated 19.04.2022 and numbered 31814, in the case of the employee is tracked by using the fingerprint recording system,

Board of Advertisement Decisions on Influencer Marketing

12th May 2023 In recent years, with the rapid spread of the use of social media, advertising activities have started to be carried out through social media platforms such as "Instagram", "Facebook", "YouTube".

Labor Claims Subject to Action for Unquantified Debt in the Light of the Right to a Fair Trial

12th May 2023 With the Decision ("Decision") dated 22.02.2022 and application numbered 2019/12190, published in the Official Gazette dated 20.04.2022 and numbered 31815, the Constitutional Court has decided that the right of access to the court has been violated as a result of the procedural rejection of the lawsuit filed by the employee in case the quantified claims are the subject of the action for unquantified debt.

Guidelines on Cookies Practices in Turkey

12th May 2023 Data processing activities carried out through cookies have been shaped in the line with the decisions of the Personal Data Protection Board (“Board”) for a while in Turkey.

The Decision of the Personal Data Protection Board Regarding the Cookies

12th May 2023 Since there is no particular legislative regulation on the personal data processing through the cookies within the scope of the Law on Protection of Personal Data No. 6698 (“Law”), it brings to mind the question of how this processing activity will be carried out.

Information Note on the Regulation on the Account Books and Records to be Kept by Sports Clubs

12th May 2023 New Regulation on the Account Books and Records to be Kept by Sports Clubs ("Regulation") entered into force by being published in the Official Gazette dated 07.09.2022 and numbered 31946.

Responsibility of The Data Processor for The Data Security

12th May 2023 Pursuant to Law No. 6698 on the Personal Data Protection Law (“Law”), the data controller, which means the person who determines the purposes and means of processing personal data and is responsible for the establishment and management of the data filing system, has certain obligations such as to inform,  regarding data security, to respond to applications made by data subjects, to fulfill the decisions of the Personal Data Protection Board (“Board”),  to register with the Data Controllers Registry and to notify the Board in case of a data breach.