The Legal 500

Graf & Pitkowitz

STADIONGASSE 2, 1010 WIEN, AUSTRIA
Tel:
Work +43 1 401 17
Fax:
Fax +43 1 401 17 40
Email:
Web:
www.gpp.at
Graz, Vienna

Austria

Banking and finance
Banking and finance - ranked: tier 4

Graf & Pitkowitz

Graf & Pitkowitz is dedicated to advising banks and investment funds on a wide range of banking matters such as debt financing, project finance and refinancing transactions, in addition to which it is also active in banking litigation. Otto Wächter is the key contact.

[back to top]

Commercial, corporate and M&A
Commercial, corporate and M&A - ranked: tier 5

Graf & Pitkowitz

Ferdinand Graf’s team at Graf & Pitkowitz provides ‘high value for money’, and is particularly active in M&A, joint ventures, merger control mandates and restructurings. Its client roster includes Zent Group, VKR Holding and Teak Holz International.

[back to top]

Dispute resolution
Dispute resolution - ranked: tier 2

Graf & Pitkowitz

Graf & Pitkowitz has substantial experience in commercial litigation and international arbitration and increasingly acts for clients in the financial services, telecoms and energy industries. It recently represented Facebook and the Madoff trustee, Irving Picard. Nikolaus Pitkowitz heads the team, which ‘exercises excellent judgement’.

[back to top]

EU and competition
EU and competition - ranked: tier 4

Graf & Pitkowitz

Graf & Pitkowitz represented Coca-Cola HBC Austria in competition disputes, which are a key element of the practice. Ferdinand Graf’s team, which has close links to the public procurement department, is also involved in merger clearance matters and investigations.

[back to top]

Employment
Employment - ranked: tier 4

Graf & Pitkowitz

Graf & Pitkowitz advises employers on redundancies, restructurings, outsourcings, pension and benefit schemes, among other matters. Jakob Widner’s ‘reliable’ and ‘knowledgeable’ team was strengthened by the return of Axel Guttmann, who re-joined the firm after a period working in-house.

[back to top]

Insolvency and corporate recovery
Insolvency and corporate recovery - ranked: tier 1

Graf & Pitkowitz

Graf & Pitkowitz has a strong profile for contentious and non-contentious bankruptcy, insolvency and restructuring cases. ‘Dedicated’ practice head Alexander Isola and the ‘very knowledgeable’ Stefan Weileder advised ZinkPower on the acquisition of the insolvent Peter Lössl GmbH.

[back to top]

Intellectual property
Intellectual property - ranked: tier 4

Graf & Pitkowitz

Graf & Pitkowitz’s ‘professional’, ‘knowledgeable’ team is particularly active in the life sciences and luxury goods sectors, and has experience in trade mark and patent matters, including litigation. The ‘very reliable’ Claudia Csáky is advising Austrian advertising agency kraftwerk Agentur für neue Kommunikation on a range of trade mark and copyright issues.

[back to top]

Private client
Private client - ranked: tier 3

Graf & Pitkowitz

Graf & Pitkowitz is experienced in advising individuals, trusts and private foundations on tax optimisation of successions and in asserting or defending inheritance claims. Practice head Armenak Utudjian focuses on real estate asset management and private foundation law matters, including the creation and restructuring of trusts.

[back to top]

Public procurement
Public procurement - ranked: tier 4

Graf & Pitkowitz

Graf & Pitkowitz advises domestic and international corporations in various industries on general public procurement matters. Otto Wächter heads the practice.

[back to top]

Real estate and construction
Real estate - ranked: tier 4

Graf & Pitkowitz

Nikolaus Pitkowitz and Martin Förster head Graf & Pitkowitz’s ‘very responsive’ team, which has a core focus on representing clients in the retail, hotel and leisure industry, and has particular experience in property development, transactions, leasing and real estate disputes. The client portfolio includes Regus and PG-Liegenschaftsverwaltung.

[back to top]


Further information on Graf & Pitkowitz

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Graf & Pitkowitz in other jurisdictions.

Austria

Offices in Vienna and Graz

Legal Developments in Austria

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Austria: Amendments to Gas Market Model Ordinance

    The Gas Market Model Ordinance plays a major role in the Austrian gas market, as it regulates network access and the capacity management and balancing system in Austria's three market areas: the east, Tyrol and Vorarlberg. read more...
  • Arbitrators’ Liability: Austrian Supreme Court Reconfirms Strict Standards

    One of the main advantages of arbitration vis-à-vis state court litigation, is that the parties are free to choose independent and highly specialised experts to decide their cases. Yet, if these experts negligently (or even deliberately) violate the duties that come with the acceptance of the appointment, the issue of liability arises. read more...
  • A new WCC department within the Metropolitan Public Prosecution Office

    As of September 1st 2016, a newly established special department, dedicated solely to white collar crimes, has commenced its work within the Hungarian Metropolitan Public Prosecution Office (Fővárosi Főügyészség). read more...
  • EU: News on linking from the CJEU

    The CJEU already had the chance to rule on the legitimacy (under copyright law) of hyperlinks to copyrighted works in the Svensson (C-466/12) and Bestwater (C-348/13) cases. In both cases the court came to the conclusion that hyperlinks to copyrighted works freely available on another website are not "communications to the public" (ie a "new public") and therefore do not require the consent of the right holders. read more...
  • Bulgaria takes steps to implement Directive 2014/104/EU

    On 2 September 2016, the Bulgarian Commission for Protection of Competition proposed a draft act for amendments (the "Draft") to the Competition Protection Act (the "CPA"). These amendments aim to implement Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 November 2014, on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law, for infringements of competition law provisions of Member States, and of the European Union (the "Directive"). read more...
  • Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration: Who Should Bear the Risk of an Impecunious Claimant?

    When allocating costs, investment arbitration tribunals apply two principles: a “pay your own way” principle which provides that each party pays its own legal costs and they effectively share the costs of the proceedings, and secondly a “costs follow the event” or “loser pays” principle which provides that the losing party bears the costs of the proceedings including the legal costs of the successful party. read more
  • Hungary: HCA and NIPN conclude cooperation agreement for pharmaceutical consumer protection cases

    Pharmaceutical companies and other healthcare suppliers have always been of special interest to the Hungarian Competition Authority (HCA) due to the associated public health concerns. In light of this, the HCA has concluded several cooperation agreements with other agencies to facilitate the investigation of these markets. Initially, the agreements were developed with the authorities responsible for the authorisation and monitoring of medical devices and food supplements. read more...
  • Hungary: Towards strengthened investor protection

    After the broker scandals of 2015, the government introduced new protective measures this year to restore Hungarian investors' trust in capital markets instruments and investment service providers. In 2015, it was discovered that some local broker houses had manipulated their information systems and as a result their reports on securities were not an accurate reflection of the reality. read more...
  • ECJ issues preliminary ruling on cross-border mergers

    On August 28 2014 the Austrian Supreme Court submitted a request to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) (6 Ob 137/13 k) for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of EU law regarding cross-border mergers. read more...
  • #Rio2016 - A Trademark Infringement?

    Recent media coverage has reported that it will be prohibited for companies to use hashtags such as #Rio2016, or to share official reports regarding the Olympic Games on social media. Are these serious threats? Or are they simply (unsuitable) attempts to protect official sponsors as comprehensively as possible? read more...