The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Foot Anstey

INTERNATIONAL HOUSE, SOUTHAMPTON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARK, GEORGE CURL WAY, SOUTHAMPTON, SO18 2RZ, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work (0)2380 172222

South East: Corporate and commercial

Corporate and Commercial: Hampshire
Corporate and Commercial: Hampshire - ranked: tier 3

Foot Anstey

Foot Anstey's practice has had a marked uptick in cross-border mandates, with the firm acting for entities in the US, Portugal and Belgium, among other markets. Mark Pinder in Southampton has been instrumental in building up the firm's international practice, and has a wealth of experience of cross-border M&A work, with particular knowledge of the Middle East. The firm has core strengths in matters connected with the banking and finance, media and technology, property, infrastructure and construction, and retail and leisure sectors.

Practice head(s):Mark Pinder

[back to top]

South East: Real estate

Commercial property: Hampshire
Commercial property: Hampshire - ranked: tier 4

Foot Anstey

Foot Anstey provides a full service to clients with its commercial property practice operating on a cross-office basis as one team. In Southampton, an 11-strong team has a particular focus on residential development, with clients in this space including regional and national housebuilders, as well as registered providers of affordable housing. Property portfolio management work is another area of focus, and the firm generates a significant amount of repeat work from a number of key clients; Carol Phillips is the name to note in this area. Martin Hirst is the head of the practice.

Practice head(s):Martin Hirst

Work highlights

  • Acted for Berkeley Homes (Western) Limited on a complex joint venture with London and Quadrant Housing for the acquisition of a site in Reading with planning permission for 765 residential dwellings plus five commercial units where Berkeley contracted to take the freehold of the development site
  • Acted for Berkeley Homes (Oxford & Chiltern) Limited on the acquisition of the iconic former Horlicks Factory in Slough from Glaxo SmithKline (GSK).
  • Acting for new client Direct Wines on property matters, including the negotiation of a lease of a new retail space.
  • Advising Screwfix Direct Limited on the continued roll out of English trade counters.

[back to top]

Property litigation
Property litigation - ranked: tier 4

Foot Anstey

Foot Anstey's highly regarded property litigation department generates repeat work from clients in the retail, technology and infrastructure and development sectors, among various others. It has had a recent increase in portfolio management mandates, and also matters relating to residential property development. Kate New, who heads up the practice in Southampton, focuses on commercial landlord and tenant issues. as well as development disputes.

Practice head(s):Kate New

Testimonials

'Foot Anstey is a solid, competent firm when it comes to property litigation'.

'Kate New has a practical, no nonsense approach'.

Key Clients

Beechcroft Developments Limited

London Borough of Tower Hamlets

Screwfix Direct

Berkeley Homes (Oxford & Chiltern) Limited

B&Q Plc

Grass Valley (A Belden Brand)

Work highlights

  • The firm advises Screwfix on its occupational property portfolio comprising over 500 trade counter/stores.
  • The firm advised Beechcroft Developments on the determination of a joint venture development agreement, where a defaulting party sought to terminate the agreement in a manner in which it would avoid paying contractual damages owed to the client.
  • The firm advised B&Q on an urgent break notice where the landlord was looking to frustrate the break right.

[back to top]

Social housing
Social housing - ranked: tier 3

Foot Anstey

Foot Anstey's practice is primarily focused on advising registered providers of affordable housing who are developing new homes, and the firm is particularly strong in development transactions. Team head Martin Hirst has specialist expertise in open market, mixed-use and regeneration schemes.

Practice head(s):Martin Hirst

Key Clients

VIVID Housing Limited

Radian Group Limited

LiveWest Homes

London Borough of Tower Hamlets

Merlin Housing Society

Coastline Housing Limited

Magna Housing Limited

Trent & Dove Housing Limited

PHA Homes Limited

Yarlington Housing Group

Ocean Housing Limited

Stonewater Limited

[back to top]

South East: TMT (technology, media and telecoms)

Intellectual property
Intellectual property - ranked: tier 3

Foot Anstey

The 'efficient' intellectual property team at Foot Anstey is led by national department head Paul Cox who splits his time between the firm's Southampton and Bristol offices. A key feature of the firm's south east practice is its anti-counterfeiting and brand protection work, as well as its litigation expertise.

Practice head(s):Paul Cox

Other key lawyers:Rachel Warren; Chandni Jobanputra

Testimonials

'The team at Foot Anstey is practical, efficient and sharp.'

'They are able to handle, manage and advise a wide range of IP related matters.'

'When we instructed the firm, Paul's leadership was instrumental in the firm being able to handle client's matter so well.'

Key Clients

Sky

Trinity Mirror/Reach Plc

University of the West of England

Lypiatt Studio (studio of the late sculptor Lynn Chadwick)

Eden Project

Royal Academy of Dance

Spectrum Collections Limited

PA Group

Pay.UK

Flybe

Work highlights

  • Acted for TOMY UK in the identification of counterfeit products coming into the UK and the seizure of the goods through HM Customs & Excise.
  • Managing the trade mark portfolio of Pay.uk and dealing with infringement issues.
  • Representing Spectrum Collections client in an unregistered design right infringement claim before the IPEC.
  • A member of the Intellectual Property team is seconded to the retail client one day a week to assist with general intellectual property and brand protection issues including counterfeiting matters.
  • Acting for the commercial trading entity of the Royal Academy of Dance and a dancewear manufacturer, International Dance Supplies, in IPEC proceedings relating to design right infringement in a range of RAD-licensed dance wear.
Leading individuals

Paul Cox - Foot Anstey

[back to top]


Further information on Foot Anstey

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Foot Anstey in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

South East

Offices in Southampton

South West

Offices in Exeter EX1, Plymouth PL4, Truro TR1, Taunton TA1, Bristol BS2, Plymouth PL4, Bristol BS1, Exeter EX1, Taunton TA1, and Truro TR1

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.