The Legal 500

BRIDEWELL COURT, 14 NEW BRIDGE STREET, LONDON, EC4V 6AG, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7353 1990
Fax:
Fax 020 7353 1880
DX:
447 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Web:
www.barkco.com
Email:

Bark & Co’s clients benefit from the support of one of the country’s leading fraud and business crime firms. It’s highly-skilled lawyers are committed to providing top class advice at every stage of proceedings. If it can prevent expensive litigation then it will; if not then it will fight tenaciously to protect its clients’ interests.

The firm: Established in 1996 by Giles Bark-Jones, Bark & Co has developed into one of the UK’s most progressive and successful fraud firms. A member of the Specialist Fraud Panel, it handles commercial and criminal fraud, business and tax regulation, tax investigations, white-collar crime and serious crime for individuals, national and international companies and other bodies. The firm has also established itself as a leader in the field of cash and asset recovery in both criminal and civil courts.

Bark & Co prides itself on the individual qualities of its people, the collective strength of its teams, and their skill in tailoring advice to meet each client’s individual needs. This flexible approach and rigorous commitment to quality has allowed the firm to win significant amounts of work through client referrals.

Types of work undertaken: Bark & Co handles a wide range of white-collar crime and fraud cases, including prosecutions and investigations brought by SOCA, HM Revenue & Customs, the SFO, the Special Compliance Office of the Inland Revenue, the CPS and other prosecuting bodies.

Corporate and commercial fraud: Bark & Co became a member of the Serious Fraud Panel at its inception and its senior staff are accredited as supervisors of the most serious and complex cases. Acknowledged as one of the leaders in the field, the firm has gained experience in many of the major prosecutions brought by the SFO and other agencies.

Expertise includes tax regulation, VAT and duties tribunal work, defence of duty evasion, money-laundering and carousel fraud, as well as mortgage fraud, investment fraud, corruption, pension fund fraud, telecoms fraud, theft, fraudulent trading by company directors and internet fraud. Dedicated teams also deal with confiscation and post- and pre-charge restraint proceedings.

Recent notable work includes; the most high-profile Serious Fraud Office prosecution concerning PollyPeck International; R v D of Torex Retail Plc involving charges of false accounting; R v F in which prosecution counsel described the proceedings as the ‘biggest case ever’, and which involved an allegation of carbon trading fraud. Finally, the firm’s FSA work incudes large-scale insider dealing cases and one of the first s397 FSMA prosecutions.

Criminal: The firm continues to act in large, high-profile criminal trials, including murder, money laundering, drugs importations, armed robbery and people smuggling cases. It focuses on high-end work, much of it international.

In R v Vian & ors; concerning police corruption in the historical axe-in-the-head murder case from 20 years ago, a not guilty verdict was decided in respect of the client following a complex and fiercely fought challenge to the Crown’s overall evidence during protracted many protected pre-trial legal arguments.

The firm also advises individuals and companies facing investigation or criminal proceedings as a result of health and safety breaches, taking cases from precharge interviews through to trial.

For more information, please see the firm’s website.

Breakdown of work %
General crime 15
White-collar crime/fraud 85

Number of UK partners 1
Number of other UK fee-earners 50

Above material supplied by Bark & Co.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
  • Premium service for tier 2 and 5 sponsors to be launched

    A premium service for sponsors will be launched by the UKBA on 6 April 2012. The service is designed specifically for companies that sponsor international employees under tier 2 and 5 of the points based system and aims to provide them with enhanced support.