The Legal 500

Anderson Strathern

1 RUTLAND COURT, EDINBURGH, EH3 8EY, SCOTLAND
Tel:
Work 0131 270 7700
Fax:
Fax 0131 270 7788
DX:
ED3 EDINBURGH-1
Email:
Web:
www.andersonstrathern.co.uk

Anderson Strathern LLP is one of Scotland’s leading full service law firms. It provides specialist legal advice to commercial clients, public bodies and private individuals throughout the UK and overseas.

The firm: Anderson Strathern has 57 partners, circa 300 staff, seven solicitor advocates and 23 accredited specialists operating across three offices.

Client service is of the upmost importance to the firm and as certified holders of ISO standards in information security, quality management, environment management and health and safety, Anderson Strathern is within a small group of UK law firms externally accredited for deploying best practice and delivering high-quality services.

Anderson Strathern is the only Scottish law firm to be accredited with Investors in People Gold status, the mark of a cutting-edge organisation operating at the highest level of people management practice. This demonstrates that its people are at the heart of its success.

During 2013/14 there have been a number of partner promotions including: Jonathan Guy (commercial litigation); Adele Nicol and Sheonagh Richards (land resources); Barry Nichol (employment); Chris Richardson (commercial real estate); Carole Tomlinson (private client) and Catriona Watt (healthcare and regulatory). A number of significant appointments have been made including: Sara Jalicy, head of residential property, who joined the firm from Balfour and Manson; Colin Young who joined the corporate team in Glasgow from Morisons LLP; Alister Aitkenhead formerly of Morisons LLP who joined the private client team in Glasgow; Jennifer Long who joined the family law division from Turcan Connell; and Robin Beattie, also from Turcan Connell, who has joined the land resources team.

The firm has retained a number of prestige panel appointments including the Crown Estate, City of Edinburgh Council, University of the West of Scotland, the University of Edinburgh, the University of Stirling, Edinburgh Napier University, the Parole Board for Scotland, the Coal Authority, the Scottish Social Services Council and the Scottish Children’s Reporters Administration.

The firm achieved a number of new client wins and panel appointments in 2013/14, including: APUC, Dundee City Council, Glasgow City Council, Coral Racing Ltd, High Life Highland, Energy Savings Trust, Audit Scotland, the Auditor General, the Accounts Commission, Clackmannanshire Council, Falkirk Council, Highland Council, Skills Development Scotland, and Visit Scotland.

Breakdown of work    %Dispute resolution     23
Commercial real estate     21
Private client     18
Corporate     12
Land resources     9
Employment     7
Asset management     6
Residential property     4

Number of UK partners 57

Number of other UK fee-earners 160

Above material supplied by Anderson Strathern.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HONESTY AND INVESTMENT FRAUD PROSECUTIONS

    How to build an investment fraud defence case that disproves prosecution allegations of dishonesty.
  • FRAUD, LARGE ORGANISATIONS AND THE INDIVIDUAL

    With a town council now officially facing a fraud investigation, we examine what individuals in such a large body should do if they come under suspicion.
  • The risks of liberation

    The dangers that pension liberation and money laundering pose to those involved in pension funds and management.
  • FIVE YEARS OF THE BRIBERY ACT

    What has been achieved since the introduction of the Act that was intended to tackle bribery in business?
  • FOREX AND RISK

    Five banks being fined £3.6 billion in the US for manipulating forex is a stark reminder of the legal risks involved in currency trading. Here, Aziz Rahman of Rahman Ravelli examines how the brokers and the traders in forex can avoid legal problems.
  • Foreign Intercepts

    FOREIGN INTERCEPTS
  • Finding the 
right words

    In the recent case of Newbury v Sun Microsystems [2013], the defendant argued that an offer to settle proceedings was ‘in principle' only and that a binding contract could not be formed until further terms had been agreed and a formal contract had been signed. It supported this argument by referring to a statement, in the offer letter, that the settlement was to be ‘recorded in a suitably worded agreement'. 

  • Behind the corporate veil: is that all there is?

    That companies have an existence entirely separate to that of their shareholders and directors is a foundational principle of English law and commerce.

  • Restoring environmental damage: putting a price on ecosystem services

    On 7 August 2009 a 40-inch pipeline ruptured, spilling 5,400 cubic metres of crude oil into the soil and groundwater of La Crau nature reserve in southern France, a habitat protected under French and European law. The operator had to excavate and replace 60,000 tons of soil, install 70 wells to pump and treat groundwater and 25 pumps to skim oil from surface water, at a cost in the region of €50m. However, this was just the primary remediation (that is, restoring the site to the state it would have been if the damage had not occurred). The operator was also required to compensate for the damage to the habitats and the loss of the ecosystem services that would otherwise have been provided by La Crau nature reserve. Measures included purchasing land outside of the nature reserve and contributing to its management for a period of 30 years (over €1m), monitoring the water table for 20 years (over €500,000), monitoring fauna over three years (€150,000) and rehabilitation in accordance with best available ecological techniques (nearly €2m). Overall, the compensatory restoration (to compensate for the amount of time that the ecosystem was impacted) and complimentary restoration (to compensate for elements of the ecosystem that had been permanently lost) came to more than €6.5m. 

  • The role of arbitrators in EU antitrust law

    In May 2014, it will be ten years since Regulation No 1/2003 entered into force. When the legislator of the European Union adopted this Regulation on 16 December 2002, its main objective was to decentralise the enforcement of the two main provisions of EU antitrust law, Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). Where do the arbitrators fit in this picture?