Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

South Korea > Legal Developments > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings

Editorial

New Proposed Tax Law Amendments Provide Clarification on the Taxation of Foreign Funds

November 2018 - Tax & Private Client. Legal Developments by Lee & Ko .

More articles by this firm.

On July 30, 2018, the Korean Ministry of Economy and Finance (“MOEF”) announced the proposed tax law changes/amendments for 2019 and beyond (“Proposals”). The Proposals are expected to be reviewed and finalized by the Korean National Assembly in December 2018.

Some key Proposals that should be of great interest to private equity funds and other investors relate to the Korean taxation of a foreign collective investment vehicle, referred to as an Overseas Investment Vehicle (“OIV”) in the Korean tax law. An OIV is broadly defined as an overseas vehicle that raises funds through an investment offering, manages investment assets, derives value from the acquisition and disposition of such assets, and distributes such derived value to its investors. Consequently, partnerships, limited liability companies and other types of collective investment vehicles (e.g., trusts) would likely be included in the definition of OIV.

The key provisions of the Proposals in relation to an OIV that will impact tax planning for foreign funds are summarized below.

1. Background: There has been ongoing confusion regarding the taxation of foreign funds

For foreign investors, nothing in Korean taxation has been more controversial or contentious than the concept of “beneficial ownership” as applied to foreign funds by the Korean tax authority (“NTS”). Under the current rules provided in the tax law, an OIV should basically be looked-through to the ultimate investors for application of tax treaty benefits (“OIV regime”). The tax treaty benefits are claimed by submitting the Report of Overseas Investment Vehicle (“OIV Report”) and other tax forms to the withholding agent, based on the residence and tax treaty eligibility for each investor. However, in a line of cases dealing with foreign funds, the Supreme Court ruled that a foreign fund established in a non-tax treaty jurisdiction can also be regarded as the beneficial owner (“BO”) of Korean-source income. Subsequently, the NTS started to take the position that the foreign fund itself should be treated as the BO (rather than looking-through to the ultimate investors as per the OIV regime). And since most foreign funds are located in tax haven jurisdictions without any tax treaty protection (such as Cayman Islands, BVI, etc.), this meant full Korean domestic taxation would apply on capital gains, dividends, etc.

2. The Proposals would revise the foreign entity classification rules and strengthen the OIV regime

The MOEF’s Proposals include 3 significant amendments to clarify and enhance the scheme for taxing Korean-source income with respect to OIVs (e.g., foreign funds).

Revision to the entity classification rules

First, under the current foreign entity classification rules, a foreign entity (including an OIV) is considered a company for Korean tax purposes if any 1 of the following 4 criteria are met:

a. The entity has legal personality under the law of the country in which it was incorporated;

b. The entity is only comprised of partners or members with limited liability;

c. The entity has the same or similar characteristics to a company as defined under the Korean Commercial Law; or

d. The entity can hold assets, can be a party to a lawsuit, or has rights and obligations separate from its members/partners.

Under this Proposal, the 4th criteria will be eliminated. According to guidelines published by the MOEF, the reason for the elimination of last criteria was that, in the past, there was confusion since a partnership in many jurisdictions can hold assets and be a party to a lawsuit, etc.

Clarification on taxation of non-corporate OIVs

Second, the rules for taxation of non-corporate entities will be revised to provide clarification regarding how Korean tax will be applied to such entities.

Specifically, this Proposal states that Korean-source income earned by a non-corporate foreign entity is retained and tested at the level of each investor. In addition, if the entity only discloses a portion of its partners/investors, only that portion of the income will be taxed at the investor level (the remainder being taxed at the entity level). And in the case of corporate investors, the Proposal clarifies that corporate income tax (rather than individual income tax) will be applied.

New rules to determine if an OIV can be viewed as the beneficial owner

Third, a new provision will be introduced to prescribe specific rules to determine the beneficial ownership of Korean-source income in case of investment into Korea through an OIV.

Under this Proposal, an OIV (e.g., a foreign fund) shall be viewed as the BO of Korean-source income if any 1 of the following 3 conditions is satisfied.

a. If the OIV is liable to tax in its jurisdiction of residence and the OIV was not established to avoid/reduce tax on Korean-source income ;

b. If the OIV does not disclose its partners/investors, then the OIV shall be regarded as the BO to the extend its investors are not disclosed (but the OIV will be taxed at the Korean domestic corporate income tax rates); or

c. If the OIV is respected as the BO under an applicable tax treaty.

These Proposals are schedule to become effective from January 1, 2020. 

3. Significance: Foreign fund investors should have more clarity on the Korean tax implications of their investments

Taken as a whole, these Proposals would confirm that the look-through approach prescribed under the current OIV regime is the correct approach to tax Korean source income in the case of foreign funds and other collective investment vehicles. Accordingly, assume the Proposals are enacted into law as put forth, we believe the NTS may no longer rely on the Supreme Court cases to stop and impose domestic Korean tax on an OIV located in a non-treaty jurisdiction to the extent that the OIV can disclose its investors. Thus, these Proposals can be viewed as a favorable development and should provide more clarity in structuring investments into Korea for foreign private equity funds and other investors.

But please note that these Proposals will be effective from January 1, 2020. It is currently unclear whether the NTS will still accept the OIV regime/look-through approach between now and when these Proposals are enacted into law.

If you have any questions regarding this article, please contact below:

Jae Hoon Kim (jaehoon.kim@leeko.com)

Jay SHIM (jay.shim@leeko.com)

Ok Hyun MA (okhyun.ma@leeko.com)

For more information, please visit our website: www.leeko.com

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

Dinner with GC -
Korea 2018

  • China and Hong Kong GC Powerlist

    In May, The Legal 500 and GC Magazine added another country to the list of destinations for their exclusive Dinner with GC series, as South Korea’s elite in-house counsel came together at Mugunghwa in Seoul, for a closed-door discussion on the realities of the role.

    Dinner with GC - Korea 2018