Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

United Kingdom > Scottish Bar > Planning, environmental and licensing > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings



Index of tables

  1. Leading Silks
  2. Leading Juniors

Leading Silks

  1. 1
    • Douglas Armstrong QC - Terra Firma ChambersAn excellent advocate who knows his stuff inside out
    • James Findlay QC - Terra Firma ChambersOne of the foremost planning specialists at the Scottish Bar.
  2. 2
    • Ruth Crawford QC - Axiom AdvocatesHer analytical and leadership skills never fail to impress.
    • Marcus McKay QC - Ampersand AdvocatesHighly experienced in energy-related planning work.
    • James Mure QC - Axiom AdvocatesA great analyst who has the ear of the court.

Leading Juniors

  1. 1
    • Gavin Anderson - Compass ChambersPresents compelling legal arguments in a most persuasive manner.
    • Scott Blair - Terra Firma ChambersHe has extensive knowledge and expertise in licencing law.
    • Alasdair Burnet - Terra Firma ChambersGood on his feet and handles matters with a quiet confidence.
    • Laura-Anne van der Westhuizen - Ampersand AdvocatesA first-class planning junior.
  2. 2
    • Graham Dunlop - Terra Firma ChambersPragmatic, personable, and approachable.
    • Robert Skinner - Terra Firma ChambersA highly experienced licensing practitioner.

Ampersand Advocates is home to planning law specialists Marcus McKay QC and Laura-Anne van der Westhuizen, who are often instructed in complex or high-profile inquiries and appeals. Notable recent highlights include McKay's representation of The Viking Wind Farm in a consent application under crofting legislation, and Westhuizen's work on behalf of the Scottish ministers in an appeal lodged by a dairy farm following the refusal of planning permission for a large greenbelt development.

Axiom Advocates is home to Ruth Crawford QC and James Mure QC, who are frequently instructed in high profile planning cases, such as Crawford's representation of Transport Scotland in an inquiry concerning the A96 Trunk Road, as well as her representation of Aberdeen City Council in a judicial review concerning the New Aberdeen Stadium project, which aims to replace Pittodrie as the home of Aberdeen FC.

Gavin Anderson at Compass Chambers is highly experienced in defending in environmental criminal cases, and continues this work following his move from Westwater Advocates in June 2018.

Terra Firma Chambers are 'the best stable in Scotland for planning law' according to several clients, with 'unrivalled strength in depth' in this area. Notable recent cases include a judicial review challenge to Aberdeen FC's plans to build a new stadium, in which James Findlay QC acted for the club, and Gladman Development Ltd v Scottish Ministers, in which Douglas Armstrong QC acted for developer Gladman in its challenge to the strategic development plans of several local authorities.

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has  ‘previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules’,  the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11). 
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal. The  explanatory notes  to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the  Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002  (“the 2002 Act”). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.

Press Releases in the UK

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to