Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

United Kingdom > Scottish Bar > Civil liberties, human rights, public inquiries, and public and administrative law (including local government) > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings

Editorial

Other

Index of tables

  1. Leading Silks
  2. Leading Juniors

Leading Silks

  1. 1
    • Ruth Crawford QC - Axiom AdvocatesShe gives careful and considered advice in public procurement matters.
    • James Findlay QC - Terra Firma ChambersThorough, approachable and good with clients.
    • Aidan O'Neill QC - Ampersand AdvocatesIntellectually impressive and creative in his approach to dealing with issues of public law.
    • Douglas Ross QC - Ampersand AdvocatesHighly intelligent and tenacious, with good common sense
    • Morag Ross QC - Axiom AdvocatesCombines a sharp intellect with a measured approach and first-rate written and oral presentation skills.
  2. 2
    • Dorothy Bain QC - Ampersand AdvocatesHighly recommended for civil liberties work.
    • Jonathan Barne QC - Axiom AdvocatesA swaggering and debonair presence in the courtroom.
    • Sir Crispin Agnew of Lochnaw Bt QC - Westwater AdvocatesA notable figure in complex judicial review petitions.
    • David Johnston QC - Axiom AdvocatesParticularly recommended for legal opinions on complex public law matters.
    • Kenny McBrearty QC - Axiom AdvocatesDiligent and knowledgeable in civil liberties work.
    • Jonathan Mitchell QC - Arnot Manderson AdvocatesHis practice includes high-profile judicial reviews.
    • James Mure QC - Axiom AdvocatesHis practice includes both advisory and litigation work in public law cases.
    • Stephen O'Rourke QC - Terra Firma ChambersA good communicator and a confident advocate.
    • Janys Scott QC - Westwater AdvocatesShe has a real depth of knowledge, as well as excellent preparation and delivery.
    • Andrew Webster QC - Hastie StableInstructed on a wide range of public law and human rights matters.

Leading Juniors

  1. 1
    • Scott Blair - Terra Firma ChambersHe has strong analytical and communication skills.
    • Ewen Campbell - Axiom AdvocatesVery bright, with a good eye for detail.
    • Lesley Irvine - Axiom AdvocatesKnowledgeable, pragmatic and meticulous.
    • Mark Lindsay QC - Axiom AdvocatesVery experienced in a wide range of public and administrative law matters.
    • David Welsh - Axiom AdvocatesIntellectually impressive and unflappable in court.
    • Laura-Anne van der Westhuizen - Ampersand AdvocatesA first-class legal mind who deals well with complicated cases.
  2. 2
    • Alasdair Burnet - Terra Firma ChambersHis practices includes judicial reviews and major public inquiries.
    • Dan Byrne - Axiom AdvocatesInstructed in a wide range of public and administrative law cases.
    • Alan Caskie - Hastie StableNoted for his expertise in immigration matters.
    • Julius Komorowski - Terra Firma ChambersFrequently instructed on behalf of the government in public law cases.
    • Stephen Winter - Terra Firma ChambersSpecialises in asylum and immigration matters.
    • Timothy Young - Ampersand AdvocatesTechnically excellent in public procurement matters.

Key areas of work at Ampersand Advocates include EU law, judicial review, and procurement matters. Aidan O’Neill QC recently lead on behalf of the petitioners in Wightman v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, an Court of Justice of the European Union case concerning if it was possible for a member state to revoke its notification of intent to leave the European Union under Article 50.

Arnot Manderson Advocates is home to Jonathan Mitchell QC, who is regularly instructed on a wide range of civil liberties and judicial review cases.

According to one client, Axiom Advocates is home to 'the strongest collection of expertise at the Scottish Bar in relation to public law,' with particularly strong expertise at the senior level. Ruth Crawford QC and Ewen Campbell recently acted for the Scottish Ministers in a judicial review challenging the proposed subsidy for ferry services to the Northern Isles. Campbell also acts as junior to Morag Ross QC for one of the defenders in a case concerning £35m of alleged state aid awarded to Global Energy Group.

Hastie Stable is particularly experienced in immigration and asylum cases, along with judicial review and human rights matters. Andrew Webster QC took silk in 2018.

Terra Firma Chambers houses a wide range of advocates specialising in public law cases. Key areas of work include asylum and immigration, judicial review, and public inquiries such as the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry, in which Roy Martin QC and Alasdair Burnet act for City of Edinburgh Council.

Westwater Advocates' public law barristers are particularly specialised in complex judicial review cases, with members appearing in Supreme Court cases. Janys Scott QC represented the anonymised benefit claimant in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM, a case concerning the calculation of Personal Independence Payment when some impairments are caused by mental health issues rather than physical disabilities. In the Inner House of the Court of Session, Sir Crispin Agnew of Lochnaw Bt QC represented six farming limited partnerships in the McMaster v the Scottish Ministers concerning the Human Rights Act compatibility of 2014 changes to land law.

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has  ‘previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules’,  the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11). 
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS – CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal. The  explanatory notes  to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the  Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002  (“the 2002 Act”). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.

Press Releases in the UK

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to