Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

The Legal 500 Hall of Fame Icon The Legal 500 Hall of Fame highlights individuals who have received constant praise by their clients for continued excellence. The Hall of Fame highlights, to clients, the law firm partners who are at the pinnacle of the profession. In the United Kingdon, the criteria for entry is to have been recognised by The Legal 500 as one of the elite leading lawyers for eight years. These partners are highlighted below and throughout the editorial.
Click here for more details

United Kingdom > North > Crime, fraud and licensing > Crime: fraud > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings



Index of tables

  1. Crime: fraud
  2. Leading individuals

Leading individuals

  1. 1
    • Mark Harrison - Hay & Kilner
    • Ravi Khosla - Kenneth M Barrow & Co

David Gray Solicitors LLP has particular expertise in large-scale fraud and benefit fraud, advising private individuals and business entities. Brian Hegarty, who leads the team, is an experienced higher court advocate, while  solicitor Janice Hall, who focuses on motoring offences and cases of domestic violence and sexual offences, is also notable in this area.

Practice head(s):Brian Hegarty

Other key lawyers:Janice Hall

Hay & Kilner’s practice focuses on white-collar and corporate fraud, specialising in complex fraud and proceeds of crime cases. Mark Harrison leads the team and is particularly experienced in high-value fraud and POCA matters. The team has recently been boosted by solicitor advocate Jonathan Cousins, who joined from David Gray Solicitors LLP in 2018; assistant solicitor Mark Styles, who arrived from Kyles Legal Practice in 2019; and Matthew Purves, who was promoted to associate in 2018.

Practice head(s):Mark Harrison

Other key lawyers:Jonathan Cousins; Mark Styles; Matthew Purves

Key Clients

New Park Court Chambers

Work highlights

  • The defendant was charged with VAT fraud in excess of £150,000 following the alleged misrepresentation of his self-employed income as a scrap metal dealer. After examination and scrutiny, the defendant was ultimately found culpable for less than one third of the amount initially claimed and spared immediate custody, as well as avoiding a proceeds of crime investigation.
  • The defendant and his business partner were convicted of large scale fraud and the police subsequently made an application for proceeds of crime seizure of his business assets which were substantially in excess of £1m. The defendant is currently contesting the proceeds of crime application and has made, as a result of the team's guidance, has made significant inroads into the amount which the police claim they are entitled to.
  • The defendant was charged as part of a conspiracy to commit fraud in a high value and well organised series of offences involving cloned credit cards and stolen electronic equipment.
  • The defendant was accused, as part of his business as an accountant, of charging VAT which was then kept by him and not declared. Upon service of a very detailed defence statement during the Crown Court proceedings, the prosecution reviewed their position and discontinued the case, exonerating him of any wrongdoing.

Kenneth M Barrow & Co, a Very High Cost Case accredited firm, specialises in defending serious, high value and complex fraud cases. Practice head Ravi Khosla is notably experienced in complex fraud and leads a team that also includes Sunny Thandi, who was promoted to director in 2018.

Practice head(s):Ravi Khosla

Other key lawyers:Sunny Thandi

Work highlights

  • Represented client in a large scale evasion of duty relating to cigarettes and alcohol at Wood Green Crown Court.
  • We represent clients in relation to allegations of fraudulent evasion of income tax, VAT, corporation tax and related money laundering offences at Newcastle Crown Court.
  • Clientis under investigation for fraud and money laundering offences in relation to investment schemes ran by himself.
  • Represent client in POCA proceedings in relation to fraud, money laundering and attempting to pay a money transfer in the sum of £1 million by deception.
  • We have been privately instructed by client in relation to restraint proceedings.

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

GC Diversity and Inclusion Report

In partnership with...

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

GC Diversity and Inclusion Report

In partnership with...

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.

Press Releases in the UK

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to