Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Germany > Antitrust > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings


Index of tables

  1. Antitrust
  2. Other recommended firms
  3. Leading individuals

Leading individuals

  1. 1
    • Albrecht Bach - Oppenländer Rechtsanwälte
    • Helmut Bergmann - Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    • Ingo Brinker - Gleiss Lutz
    • Hans-Joachim Hellmann - SZA Schilling, Zutt & Anschütz Rechtsanwalts AG
    • Tobias Klose - Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    • Martin Klusmann - Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    • Thorsten Mäger - Hengeler Mueller
    • Romina Polley - Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
    • Dirk Schroeder - Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
    • Daniela Seeliger - Linklaters
    • Christoph Stadler - Hengeler Mueller
    • Christian Steinle - Gleiss Lutz
    • Markus Wirtz - Glade Michel Wirtz - Corporate & Competition

Who Represents Who

Find out which law firms are representing which Antitrust clients in Germany using The Legal 500's new comprehensive database of law firm/client relationships. Instantly search over 925,000 relationships, including over 83,000 Fortune 500, 46,000 FTSE350 and 13,000 DAX 30 relationships globally. Access is free for in-house lawyers, and by subscription for law firms. For more information, contact


Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer’s team has ‘excellent industry knowledge’ and gives ‘outstanding advice’ on antitrust matters. Complex merger control proceedings are a key focus, but the team is also ‘very competent in sanction proceedings’ and highly visible in energy antitrust law. It advised Coty in merger control proceedings related to the acquisition of a large portion of Procter & Gamble’s beauty division and represented the Japanese glass manufacturer AGC in various pending parallel damage proceedings relating to the car glass cartel. Other clients include REWE, Deutsche Bahn and Mars. Tobias Klose and Ulrich Scholz are also recommended along with ‘outstanding’ co-head of the global practice Martin Klusmann. Katrin Gaßner was promoted to partner. Michael Esser joined Latham & Watkins LLP; Burkhard Richter and Hans-Joachim Prieß retired.

A very good firm for antitrust law’, Gleiss Lutz advises key clients such as Daimler, Siemens, HeidelbergCement and Infineon Technologies. Practice head Ingo Brinker represented the German branch of Asics in distribution antitrust matters during appeal proceedings at the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf related to restrictions on online trade. Ulrich Denzel successfully acted for Voestalpine in proceedings at the European Commission (EC) in connection with the prestressing steel cartel. The firm also advised Accor on German merger control filings for the acquisition of luxury hotel chain FRHI. Wolfgang Bosch, Moritz Holm-Hadulla and Christian Steinle are also well regarded.

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP’s ‘outstanding’ German and EU antitrust law practice has ‘a business-oriented, very precise working method’. It excels in merger control matters, such as advising Dow Chemical on the planned merger with DuPont. The team also advised Samsonite on the acquisition of Tumi Holdings and represented Cargolux in damage claims filed by Deutsche Bahn arising from the air freight cartel. Dirk Schroeder is ‘excellent in EU-related matters’, and counsel Tilman Kuhn is ‘a rising star’. Romina Polley and Patrick Bock are also recommended.

Hengeler Mueller’s ‘fantastic lawyers’ are ‘particularly strong in matters surrounding cartel damages’ and regularly handle ‘mandates of major public interest’. The team frequently advises on large merger control proceedings; it provided antitrust law advice to ten of the largest German regional daily newspapers regarding the establishment of the joint national newspaper marketer Score Media Group. It is also strongly involved in EC antitrust proceedings, such as acting for the automotive supplier Webasto, and handling proceedings relating to the sugar, air freight and prestressing steel cartels. Google is another key client. Thorsten Mäger, Alf-Henrik Bischke and Christoph Stadler are the key figures and litigator Thomas B Paul was promoted to partner.

Linklaters often handles prominent merger control matters, as well as sanction proceedings and damages claims. The German practice benefits from strong international synergies, particularly with the Brussels office, and has particular expertise in the automotive and telecoms sectors. It advised Deutsche Börse on its planned merger with the London Stock Exchange; acted for SABMiller in connection with the takeover offer by ABInBev; and is involved in high-profile proceedings surrounding the sugar cartel. Daniela Seeliger leads the practice, in which the ‘very good’ Carsten Grave and counsel Daniel von Brevern are recommended.

CMS provides an ‘excellent service’ in antitrust matters, with particular strength in cross-border merger control, where recent representations include Telefónica Deutschland. Other clients includes Burger King, Porsche, the state of Baden-Württemberg and new client Linde. The team represented various processors of sugar in damages actions under antitrust law and acted for a company in the packaging industry in multiple proceedings by the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO), the EC and other competition authorities. Practice head Markus Schöner and Harald Kahlenberg are recommended.

Latham & Watkins LLP gives ‘clear and feasible solutions’ and its lawyers have the ‘ability to speak the client’s language’. The German practice works closely with colleagues in Brussels and the US; the team now includes the experienced Michael Esser, who divides time between Düsseldorf and Brussels after joining from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. Clients include various blue-chip companies and private equity houses. The team acted for Facebook in abuse proceedings before the FCO and advised Illinois Tool Works on the merger control aspects of the acquisition of a global business unit from ZF Friedrichshafen. Georg Weidenbach has ‘a good network’.

Noerr’s ‘proactive’ and ‘quick-thinking’ antitrust team has ‘extremely good expertise’. It represented Bosch in complex negotiations surrounding the enforcement of antitrust damage claims against members of the European rolling bearings cartel and represented Kaufland in FCO sanction proceedings concerning price fixing. The firm also handled proceedings surrounding the air freight, sugar and cement cartels and high-profile merger controls. Other prominent clients include ZDF, ThyssenKrupp and Deutsche Telekom. Practice head Alexander Birnstiel is ‘very knowledgeable and forward thinking’; Kathrin Westermann and Karsten Metzlaff are also recommended. The team works closely with the firm’s offices in Brussels and Eastern Europe.

Oppenländer Rechtsanwälte’s service is ‘comparable to that of large firms’ and is ‘thorough, practically oriented and no frills’; it is especially focused on mid-market representations. The team is ‘always informed down to the minutest detail’ and saw a high volume of merger control matters, advising clients such as Metro Group. It also represented the Bundesverband der Volks- und Raiffeisenbanken in a complaints procedure at the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf against an injunction issued by the FCO regarding amendments of terms for online banking. ‘Brilliant lateral thinker’ Albrecht Bach is recommended along with Andreas Hahn, Ulrich Klumpp and Matthias Ulshöfer. Christoph Wolf was promoted to partner.

WilmerHale focuses on antitrust litigation and ‘does a very good job’ advising clients in the energy, telecoms, transport and healthcare sectors. The practice is especially effective in damages cases and large transnational proceedings; it has been particularly busy with phase II proceedings at the FCO. Recent work includes defending Deutsche Telekom against civil claims for damages, as well as continuing to represent Lufthansa in the air freight cartel and Deutsche Bahn in the rail cartel. Baker Hughes was a recent client in merger control matters. Practice head Ulrich Quack is ‘an excellent lawyer’ and Hans-Georg Kamann is also well regarded. Counsel Julia Schwalm joined Morrison & Foerster LLP.

Allen & Overy LLP is particularly recommended for merger control, where it can leverage global resources as necessary, but covers the entire spectrum of antitrust law. It gained several new clients, including one of the world’s largest chemicals companies and a German insurance group, and represented Bell Group and Coop in opposition proceedings at the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf against a €100m-plus fine in the sausage cartel. Other clients include Google and Deutsche Börse. The ‘excellent’ Ellen Braun heads the growing team, which was strengthened by the arrival of Börries Ahrens from White & Case LLP.

Baker McKenzie’s ‘professional and speedy’ antitrust team shows ‘good industry expertise’ and can call on the firm’s extensive international network. It represented Asics in a vertical restraints case in the online distribution sector and acted for Segafredo Zanetti’s German subsidiary in a complaints procedure at the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf against a fine imposed by the Federal Cartel Court. REWE is a recent client in merger control. Practice head Christian Horstkotte is ‘well connected and a joy to work with’ and Nicolas Kredel is also recommended. Distribution antitrust law expert Johannes Teichmann was promoted to partner.

Clifford Chance is ‘very active in antitrust matters’, with a focus on merger control and state aid law. It frequently handles damages claims cases, such as acting for KONE in the scale lifts and escalators cartel, and has expertise in the energy, medical and telecoms sectors. New clients include Lanxess and Fosun International; the firm advised the latter on the takeover of Hauck & Aufhäuser and BHF Kleinwort Benson Group. ‘Very good lawyer’ Marc Besen and practice head Joachim Schütze are recommended.

Boutique Commeo LLP has quickly established itself as ‘an excellent firm in antitrust law’; the team has ‘a pragmatic approach’ with ‘a personable, solution-oriented way of working’. Areas of expertise include the pharmaceuticals, healthcare and automotive supplier industries, as well as logistics, chemicals, media and consumer goods; clients include ARD, Samsung, and the German Publishers and Booksellers Association. Damages actions under antitrust law constitute a key part of the practice; the firm handled proceedings surrounding the sugar, rolling bearings and cooling compressors cartels. Dominique Wagener, Jörg-Martin Schultze and Johanna Kübler impress cients with their ‘business sense and result-oriented solutions’; Stephanie Pautke has ‘profound expertise’.

The ‘excellent team’ at Glade Michel Wirtz - Corporate & Competition advises on merger control and contentious antitrust matters. Highlights included representing a company in sanction proceedings against a manufacturer of heat shields; in other work, the team handled antitrust proceedings in the meat and sausage, rail technology, flour mill, luxury cosmetics and food retail sectors. Samsung, Deutsche Bank and HNA Group are key clients. ‘Very good lawyer’ Markus Wirtz is recommended along with Silke Möller.

Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek has profound expertise in media, energy and distribution antitrust law and has been particularly active in FCO proceedings, including in connection with the chipboard and rolling bearings cartels. It represented Calunius Capital in damages actions under antitrust law, advised Dorma on merger controls and assisted Deutsche Fußball Liga with compliance issues. IP and technology expert Philip Kempermann was promoted to partner and Rainer Velte is recommended.

Hogan Lovells International LLP shows ‘good industry expertise’ and has a strong reputation for advice at the interface between antitrust law and IP. It has been particularly active in damage claims and administrative offences, recently defending a manufacturer in the compressor antitrust proceedings before the EC. Other clients include Air Canada and eBay. Practice head Martin Sura shows ‘courage to give practically feasible recommendations for action’; Falk Schöning relocated to the Brussels office.

Jones Day gives ‘outstanding advice’, with a focus on merger control. It advised Blackstone on merger control aspects of the purchase of real estate portfolios from Real I.S., assisted Baxalta during its takeover by Shire and has seen increased compliance-related mandates for clients such as DPD. Thomas Jestaedt and Johannes Zöttl are recommended along with Carsten Gromotke, who has ‘outstanding experience in all areas of antitrust law’. Alex Petrasincu joined Hausfeld.

Luther Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH’s ‘very capable team’ has ‘profound knowledge in antitrust and EU state aid law’. It focuses on advising mid-sized companies, primarily in sanction proceedings, damages claims and compliance matters. Carcoustics International was a client in price-fixing sanction proceedings before the FCO. The firm also handled mandates relating to the stainless steel and plumbing cartels. The ‘very active and experienced’ Thomas Kapp heads the practice, in which Holger Stappert, Anne Caroline Wegner and Guido Jansen are also recommended.

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP’s internationally well-connected antitrust team regularly advises on high-profile matters, especially in the consumer goods, medical technology, media and telecoms sectors. It advised Dallmayr in damages cases and extra-judicial negotiations relating to the coffee cartel and acted for T Brugg Kabel in proceedings against the European Commission. Merger control clients include MAN and Bilfinger. Practice head Alexander Rinne is ‘excellent’. Tatjana Mühlbach joined Buntscheck Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH.

SZA Schilling, Zutt & Anschütz Rechtsanwalts AG is active in damages cases, merger control and compliance matters, with a notable focus on the manufacturing industry. It advised Allegion in two merger control proceedings related to the restructuring of the German market for locking systems and represented Vossloh in follow-on damages claims pertaining to local public transport companies. The ‘creative’ Hans-Joachim Hellmann is recommended. The team is staffed by lawyers in Mannheim and Brussels.

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

GC Powerlist -

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • LAG Düsseldorf: Dismissal with immediate effect valid in response to threat

    Anyone who seriously threatens their employer or superior should expect to be dismissed with immediate effect. This was confirmed by a ruling of the Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG) Düsseldorf [Regional Labour Court of Düsseldorf] from June 8, 2017 (Az.: 11 Sa 823/16).
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • GSK Update: AIFM Marketing in Germany - The clock is ticking for U.S. and other non-EU fund managers

    Our GSK Update informs about the impact of recent German investment fund legislation (UCITS V Implementation Act) for AIF managers, who are not domiciled in the EU (“non-EU-AIFM”) and who seek to market AIF shares in Germany in accordance with applicable German investment fund law under the EU-AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU).
  • GSK expands Luxembourg presence with a new tax partner

    Opened at the beginning of March 2016, GSK Stockmann + Kollegen continues to expand its Luxembourg office. Mathilde Ostertag recently joined the Luxembourg team of Equity Partners Dr. Marcus Peter, Andreas Heinzmann and Dr. Philipp Mößner as Local Tax Partner.
  • EIA - Strengthening the role of the public

    Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
  • New Top Level Domains – Noerr expert warns against trademark infringements

    On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".
    - Noerr
  • No obligation to set up filtering systems in order to prevent copyright violations

    ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
  • Further ECJ Ruling concerning NGO’s right of action under German environmental law

    For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
  • Lessons in Cross-Border M & A Transactions

    The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
  • Priority rental rights in insolvency

    Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.

Press Releases in Germany

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to