The Legal 500

Australia > Intellectual property

Editorial sections

Other

All countries

Index of tables

  1. Intellectual property
  2. Leading individuals

Leading individuals

    • Russell Berry - Griffith Hack
    • Wayne Condon - Griffith Hack
    • Kathryn Everett - Herbert Smith Freehills
    • Sue Gilchrist - Herbert Smith Freehills
    • Maurice Gonsalves - King & Wood Mallesons
    • Richard Gough - Baker & McKenzie
    • Odette Gourley - Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    • Philip Kerr - Allens
    • Wayne McMaster - King & Wood Mallesons
    • Shaun McVicar - Herbert Smith Freehills
    • Mary Padbury - Ashurst LLP
    • Ian Pascarl - Davies Collison Cave
    • Katrina Rathie - King & Wood Mallesons
    • Lisa Ritson - Ashurst LLP
    • Stephen Stern - Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    • Matthew Swinn - Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    • Michael Williams - Gilbert + Tobin

Allens’ practice is headed by respected litigator Philip Kerr, and includes trade mark expert Richard Hamer and Tim Golder. Specialist areas include biotech, health and IT.

Ashurst LLP’s ‘outstanding’ group includes numerous ‘experienced IP lawyers’ who are ‘legally and tactically astute; it is led by Lisa Ritson, a ‘skilled and tenacious litigator’. Also recommended are Ben Miller, ‘one of the leading up-and-coming patent practitioners in Australia’, and Mary Padbury, an ‘extremely capable and experienced team leader with significant international experience’. The group is representing Samsung in its high-profile dispute with Apple.

Herbert Smith Freehills provides an ‘excellent level of service overall’. Current mandates including acting for a technology company in a high-profile patent infringement case. Key team members include Sue Gilchrist, Kathryn Everett, Shaun McVicar and Julian Lincoln.

King & Wood Mallesons’ 12-partner practice includes Wayne McMaster, who is representing Hospira in a patent validity and infringement action against Aventis, and is a leader in the field of IP licensing’. Scott Bouvier is ‘pragmatic’, and Katrina Rathie has the ‘rare skill of combining legal excellence and commercial awareness’. Cheng Lim is also recommended.

Headed by John Collins, Clayton Utz’ recent highlights include representing Spotless in a case against Qantas Airways for alleged trade mark infringement. Mary Still and Chris McLeod are very well regarded, and Richard Hoad made partner in January 2012.

Corrs Chambers Westgarth’s clients include Foster’s Group, Gucci, Ferrari, and Johnson & Johnson, and the team is praised for its ‘willingness to meet in person’. It advised British American Tobacco on IP protection rights following the introduction of the Tobacco Plain Packaging Act. Stephen Stern heads the practice, and the ‘outstanding’ Odette Gourley and Frances Wheelahan are also recommended.

Davies Collison Cave’s team is ‘commercially astute’, ‘strategically insightful’, and gives ‘quality advice’. It is currently representing Bayer in a patent infringement case filed against Generic Health and Lupin Australia. Ray Hind, Michael Wolnizer, and Chris Jordan are rated for ‘in-depth knowledge’ and ‘clear guidance’.

Gilbert + Tobin has a broad practice but is particularly strong in copyright matters. It acts for numerous music industry clients, and new wins included Samsung. The ‘highly knowledgeable and tenaciousMichael Williams leads the team, which recently saw the return of Kate Harrison following a stint working for the Australian Government.

Minter Ellison provides a ‘very personalised’ service, and is ‘extremely trustworthy, always acting in the best interests of clients’. Lynne Peach recently represented Zurich in a trade mark infringement case against an Australian company trading as Zurich Securities. Group leader Charles Alexander and John Fairbairn are also recommended.

Baker & McKenzie’s key strength is trade mark matters, where clients include Abott Laboratories, Nokia, the Fox Group, and Hewlett-Packard. It is also strong in copyright, where instructions included SingTel Optus. The team is ‘consistently responsive’, and has ‘great understanding of clients’ businesses’. Richard Gough gives ‘practical advice and timely responses’, while Ross McLean and practice head Robert Arnold are also recommended.

Banki Haddock Fiora’s IP group benefits from additional firm expertise in IT, media, and privacy law. Peter Banki is widely recognised, as is Peter Knight, who is ‘effective and astute’.

DLA Piper Australia recently recruited David Richardson from DibbsBarker, Amanda Turnill, and Nicholas Tyacke from Clayton Utz, and Melinda Upton from Ashurst LLP. Highlights included advising Pharmacor in three separate patent proceedings in the Federal Court. Group head Anthony Willis is ‘pragmatic’ and ‘looks at the big picture’, while Judith Miller has ‘the ability to get to the nub of a problem quickly’.

Griffith Hack traditionally began as a patent attorney group, and currently has six partners. The team recently represented Actavis in patent infringement and revocation proceedings over the statin drug Rosuvastatin, and it is defending Samsung in an infringement claim brought by Apple. Wayne Condon heads the overall practice, with Russell Berry leading on non-contentious matters.

Norton Rose Australiaimpresses with the quality of its work’, and gives ‘detailed responses’. Cameron Harvey is ‘particularly good’ as are Michael Park, Bernard O’Shea and Jackie O’Brien. The firm recently hired Frances Drummond from Herbert Smith Freehills, who has ‘many years of experience’ and adopts a ‘very commercial approach’. Key clients include GlaxoSmithKline.

IP boutique Simpsons Solicitors is relatively small, but ‘makes it its business to keep ahead of the curve’, and is regularly instructed on ‘business-critical and high-value IP matters’. Adam Simpson and special counsel Ian McDonald have a ‘deep understanding of their core areas of expertise’, and Jules Munro is also recommended.

Zaven Mardirossian is the star of Arnold Bloch Leibler’s practice, which recently advised Probiotec on the A$6m sale of its Milton brand and business to Rivadis. It also advised T2 on a manufacturing and distribution agreement with Schweppes for a packaged ice-tea drink.

Blueprint Law has a ‘deep level of knowledge’; it ‘provides very thorough advice’ and has ‘undoubted expertise in this field’. It is particularly strong in the technology space, and regularly advises on international and domestic brand protection. Group leader Gary Rogers impresses in copyright matters, and Karina Vasili is also recommended.

Henry Davis York is rated for its ‘high level of service’ and ‘detailed and accurate advice’; it also ‘gains a solid understanding of clients’ businesses’. Practice head Donna Short has ‘extensive experience and knowledge’.

Jones Day’s practice is led by Anthony Muratore and Lisa Taliadoros. The group is particularly strong in pharmaceutical patent litigation, acting for clients such as Pfizer, Sanofi, and Johnson & Johnson.

At Kelly & Co, Luke Dale is representing a number of major Australian wine companies in a trade mark opposition case against Delegat’s Wine Estate. Dale is ‘very prompt and thorough’, and practice head Rob Kennett is also highly recommended.

Maddocksalways considers the commercial aspects of instructions’, and group leader Peter Francis is ‘quick to grasp the issues’ and ‘able to deliver accurate legal advice’.

Niche firm Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick advises on various IP matters. Greg Chambers, and Graham Cowin are key names to note.

Piper Alderman provides a ‘consistently high level of service’. It is advising Bridgestone Australia on trade mark, domain name and other IP-related matters, while other clients include VOK Beverages and John Sands. Tim Clark and Tim O’Callaghan are the names to note.

TressCox ‘s team is lead by Sydney-based Jennifer Huby. It has a strong presence in the media and entertainment sector, and recently acted for BBC Worldwide Australia on a distribution deal with Roadshow.

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.

Press Releases worldwide

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to