-
Law Firms
-
London
-
Corporate and commercial
- Overview
- Commercial contracts
- Corporate tax
- Customs and Excise
- EU and competition
- Equity capital markets: UK capability
- Equity capital markets: US capability
- Financial services
- Flotations: small and mid-cap
- M&A: premium deals, £250m+
- M&A: mid-market, £50m-£250m
- M&A: smaller deals, up to £50m
- Partnership
- Private equity: transactions
- VAT and indirect tax
- Venture capital
-
Corporate and commercial
- Crime, fraud and licensing
-
London
- Dispute resolution
- Overview
- Acquisition finance
- Asset finance and leasing
- Bank lending: investment grade debt and syndicated loans
- Commodities: derivatives
- Commodities: physicals
- Corporate restructuring and insolvency
- Debt capital markets
- Derivatives and structured products
- Emerging markets
- High yield
- Investment funds
- Islamic finance
- Securitisation
- Trade finance
- Overview
- Clinical negligence: claimant
- Clinical negligence: defendant
- Insurance: corporate and regulatory
- Insurance: insolvency and restructuring
- Insurance and reinsurance litigation
- Insurance litigation: for policyholders
- Personal injury: claimant
- Personal injury: defendant
- Product liability: claimant
- Product liability: defendant
- Professional negligence
- Agriculture and estates
- Charities
- Family: Thames Valley, Berks, Oxon, M4/M40
- Family: Kent, Surrey, Sussex
- Family: Hampshire
- Family: Beds, Bucks, Herts, Middx
- Family: Essex
- Personal tax, trusts and probate: Thames Valley, Berks, Oxon, M4/M40
- Personal tax, trusts and probate: Kent, Surrey, Sussex
- Personal tax, trusts and probate: Hampshire
- Personal tax, trusts and probate: Beds, Bucks, Herts, Middx
- Personal tax, trusts and probate: Essex
The Bar
-
London Bar
- Treasury Panel Lists
- Administrative and public law (including local government)
- Aviation
- Banking and finance (including consumer credit and financial regulation)
- Charities
- Children law (including public and private law)
- Civil liberties and human rights (including public inquiry law and actions against the police)
- Clinical negligence and healthcare
- Commercial litigation
- Commodities
- Company and partnership
- Construction
- Consumer
- Costs
- Crime
- Defamation and privacy
- EU and competition
- Education
- Employment
- Energy
- Environment
- Family law (including divorce and ancillary relief)
- Fraud: civil
- Fraud: crime (including money laundering and asset forfeiture)
- Health and safety
- Immigration (including business immigration)
- Information technology
- Insolvency
- Insurance and reinsurance
- Intellectual property
- International arbitration
- Licensing
- Media, entertainment and sport
- Pensions
- Personal injury
- Planning
- Private client: personal tax
- Private client: trusts and probate
- Product liability
- Professional discipline and regulatory law (including police law)
- Professional negligence
- Property litigation (including agriculture and housing)
- Public international law
- Shipping
- Tax: corporate and VAT
- Other New Silks
- Regional Bar
- Northern Circuit
- Directory
- Bar Directory
- In-house lawyers
- Services for Lawyers
- Legal Developments
- Banking and Finance
- Conflicts of interest
- Contract
- Corporate & Commercial
- Corporate compliance & regulatory enforcement
- Corporate tax
- Cyber Crime
- Employment
- Environment
- EU & competition
- Fraud and Corporate Crime
- Immigration
- Insolvency & Restructuring
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- IT & telecommunications
- Litigation & Dispute Resolution
- Media, Entertainment & Sport
- Pensions
- Public Law
- Real Estate & Property
- Press Releases
All countries
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Anguilla
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Belize
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bolivia
- Bosnia-Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- British Virgin Islands
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Cape Verde
- Cayman Islands
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Curacao
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- Faroe Islands
- Finland
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Gibraltar
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guernsey
- Guinea
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Isle of Man
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Kyrgyzstan
- Laos
- Latin America: International firms
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Libya
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Malaysia
- Mali
- Malta
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
- Netherlands
- Netherlands Antilles
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saint Martin
- Saudi Arabia
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Seychelles
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- St Barts
- St Vincent
- Sudan
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Syria
- São Tomé E PrÃncipe
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- United Kingdom
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates
- United States
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Yemen
- Zambia
Search News and Articles
Court of Appeal rules employment agencies are not entitled to a sponsor licence
Capital Care Service (UK) Limited v SSHD (2012)
In a recent ruling in the Court of Appeal, an employment agency which provided migrant health workers to the NHS has failed in its bid for permission to apply for judicial review against the UKBA’s decision to suspend its Tier 2 sponsor licence.
Capital Care was granted a Tier 2 sponsor licence in error in January 2009 for a period of four years. The Tier 2 sponsor guidance states that employment agencies are not entitled to a sponsor licence as they do not have control of the worker’s job or function. The erroneous licence was granted on the usual understanding that it could be withdrawn at any time and the rules were subject to change. The licence was revoked in July 2011 once the mistake was uncovered.
Capital Care attempted to apply for judicial review of the decision to revoke on the grounds that it had a legitimate expectation of four years’ use of the licence, it had suffered a loss as a result and the decision was so unfair as to amount to an abuse of power.
The High Court and Court of Appeal refused permission to apply for judicial review on the basis that the licence should not have been granted in the first place, the UKBA made it clear that the four years’ duration was not guaranteed, the company could not prove loss and there was an overriding public interest in the protection of immigration control.
Contacts: Nichola Carter, Pat Saini
Related services: Immigration
For more information please visit www.penningtons.co.uk
